- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,873
- 10,668
- 147
It seems like who's starting at QB is a game by game decision now for many teams. Vick may start this week, but the leash is short.
Is that a grisly pun?
It seems like who's starting at QB is a game by game decision now for many teams. Vick may start this week, but the leash is short.
This. I don't understand why we have prisons if we are never going to forgive. He did his time, more time than normal to make an example out of him, time to move on. I just hope his speed can hold. 28-30 men get slow fast. probably not a good investment for long term due to his style.
Ray Lewis killed a guy. Donte Stallworth killed someone while driving drunk. Most of the players in the NFL are pieces of shit, but for some reason fighting dogs apparently makes you worse than all the rest. I will never understand what some people are thinking.
Anyways, this is the right decision for the Eagles this year.
No, there aren't a lot of mediocre QBs in the NFL -- there are a lot of AWFUL QBs in the NFL, 3 or 4 great ones, and a few mediocre ones.
His physical gifts are extraordinary, and no one has disputed that.
Really? Like who? How many Superbowls has Vick been to? How many passing titles has he won? How many MVPs? How many QB passing records does he hold?
Have you ever heard of Jim Hart? He made the Pro Bowl 4 times as a QB for the St. Louis Cardinals. I guess that makes him better than Vick, right?
No kidding -- he was the #1 overall pick in the 2001 draft and most #1 overall picks go to crappy teams. They traded with the Chargers to get that pick and the Chargers used that pick to get LT and their second round pick on Drew Brees. Who won that trade?
Uh, excuse me, please do a little reading on Bill Belichick's coaching career BEFORE Tom Brady and then come back and talk to us. Brady is as responsible for Belichick's success as Belichick is for Brady's.
And no, it is not a stupid comment. A stupid comment would be "Vick only has mediocre talent." No one said that. Vick's stats prior to Philly are quite frankly horrible given that he was the #1 overall pick in the 2001 draft.
His physical gifts are extraordinary, and no one has disputed that.
Your whole post is doesn't make sense. First of all Belichick started with the Patriots when Brady was drafted. Belichick was already one of the top great coaching minds in the NFL. I should know, he coached my Giants.
Obviously you missed his success in Atlanta where he actually displayed those gifts.
Also Vick had only been in the league 6 years until the dog stuff. He led his team to the playoffs his first full year as a starter, his second and in his fourth year he led his team to the NFC championship game. A team that in the two years before he was drafted had won 7 games in two years.
And had one great season, but sucked most of the decade. Now here he is with a passing system and he is completing passes like all the other "non-mediocre" qbs. And as for the he is mediocre. Looking around the league right now there are 6 QBS who are better than him and can carry their teams.
And truthfully out of that group I only like Eli and Big Ben over him. Thats it. Vick's gifts have translated to his ability for his teams to win. Period.
He can win games and make plays that most can only dream about. Even then most them can't do the things he can. I am not an Eagles fan and not even a Vick fan, but all this mediocre stuff you are slinging is bullshit.
You don't know what mediocre is obviously.
It is the best move for the team. Say what you want about Vick, but the guy is still an awesome athlete.
You obviously have no clue what it is, because as others have pointed out -- repeatedly -- he was an extremely mediocre QB in Atlanta and his stats prove it.
You can argue until you're blue in the face, but it won't matter because his passing statistics back us up.
Not only is he an "athlete" (he's always been this) but now it seems he's turned into an actual QB too.
and sometimes stats are used a little too much in judging a qb. i always thought that wins were ultimately what proved how good a qb you were. Vick, didn't affect the outcome of a game so much with his passing, we all know that. It was his ability to run that sets him apart. I remember a game against the chargers, in which he decided the game, not with his passing but his running. He's not the complete qb, but using the skills he has and understanding how he affects the game, you've got to give him more credit than calling him a mediocre qb at best. He was (and still is based on the past two weeks) a game changer. Those types of players are true rarities in the league. Ap, cj, ray lewis, darrelle revis, peyton manning, tom brady. I would put him up there not for his passing, but for what he brings to the table.
Brady
Peyton Manning
Brees
McNabb
Rivers
Rodgers
Eli Manning
Roethlisberger
Schaub
Flacco
Matt Ryan
Romo
Mcnabb
Cutler
Hasselbeck
listed 15 starting qb's that no one can deny are better qb's than Vick. That leaves Vick at 16 out of the starters. 16 out of 32 teams seems pretty mediocre to me. I didnt even include Bradford or Stafford in the conversation because they are unfinished products but anyone in their right mind would take Stafford or Bradford before Vick so he's really at 18.:/ Damn forgot Palmer. Make it 19.
And sometimes stats are used a little too much in judging a QB. I always thought that wins were ultimately what proved how good a qb you were. Vick, didn't affect the outcome of a game so much with his passing, we all know that. It was his ability to run that sets him apart. I remember a game against the Chargers, in which he decided the game, not with his passing but his running. He's not the complete qb, but using the skills he has and understanding how he affects the game, you've got to give him more credit than calling him a mediocre qb at best. He was (and still is based on the past two weeks) a game changer. Those types of players are true rarities in the league. AP, CJ, Ray Lewis, Darrelle Revis, Peyton Manning, Tom Brady. I would put him up there not for his passing, but for what he brings to the table.
I'd agree that he has the potential but I would say we've only seen flashes of brilliance and he lacks the consistency to be considered an elite player. Does he have elite skills? Absolutely.
Thanks for blowing my reasoning right out of the water.![]()
LOL My pleasure
I don't see him on Minne either, but I didn't want to shoot you down twice![]()
What elite skills? he's got elite skills of a running back... but he's too small to be a running back. He does NOT have "elite skills" of a QB. QB is a cerebral game as much as it is physical. Manning is great due to his ability to read and exploit defenses 1st and foremost above his arm and accuracy (he doesn't lack in these of course).
Vick has always had a strong arm, incredible running ability and speed, but he has ALWAYS lacked accuracy and "smarts". Lucky for him, "smarts" is something that can be learned and nurtured. In these 1st two games, it seems as though he's starting to understand the QB position more and more... if he can pick up the cerebral game BEFORe he's too old to take advantage of his running/athletic ability (he's 30 already FYI) THEN he could be seriously dangerous.
you mean, you DON'T want to see him in Minne, right?![]()
