• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Via Wins Battle over Intel.....

ssanches

Senior member
VIA Wins battle over Intel... But the war still continues....

Taipei, Taiwan, 22 December 2002 - VIA Technologies, Inc., a leading innovator and developer of silicon chip technologies and PC platform solutions, today announced that the English Court of Appeal ruled today on a key aspect of the legal dispute between Intel Corporation ("Intel") and VIA Technologies, Inc. ("VIA").

The dispute arose when Intel issued proceedings in 2001 alleging that VIA chipset and processor products infringed five Intel patents. VIA alleged as one part of its defence to those proceedings that Intel was and is acting anti-competitively in the chipset and processor markets, and so was not entitled to enforce its patents against VIA. In April of this year, Intel applied to the English High Court for summary dismissal of VIA's competition law based defence on a summary basis and was successful. VIA subsequently appealed that decision to the Court of Appeal, which has today rendered its verdict.

The Court of Appeal has upheld VIA's appeal in its entirety, overturning almost all of Mr Justice Lawrence Collins' decision at first instance. The Court of Appeal commented that the proceedings raised "momentous" issues, and noted:

"If what VIA alleges is made out then the dominance of Intel in the world-wide market in the important and developing technology for PCs is buttressed by its enormous portfolio of patents and restrictive licensing policy. This may be true of others but in the case of this technology the commercial and technical requirement for compatibility of hardware and software confers on the industry leader an even more impregnable position."

The Court of Appeal therefore concluded that the allegations of anticompetitive conduct against Intel should proceed to trial. Under the terms of the order agreed following the judgment, Intel will pay the entirety of VIA's legal costs for both the High Court and Court of Appeal hearings.

"We are pleased with the verdict," commented Richard Brown, Director of Marketing of VIA Technologies, Inc, "and we will be asking for an order for the trial of the competition law issues to be heard as soon as possible."


 
So basically, Via is infringing on patents, but the patents in the courts view make It impossible for others to compete.

Intel=Monopoly
 
Originally posted by: Snoop
So basically, Via is infringing on patents, but the patents in the courts view make It impossible for others to compete.

Intel=Monopoly
Yes, Intel=Monopoly because of it's anti-competitive conduct (in the Court of Appeal's view). VIA's alleged "infringing on patents" is (by far) the lesser of the "evils".


They are still going to trial (on the anti-competitive issue) and we have not heard the last word. But Intel is paying ALL the legal bills (for VIA, too) up till now.

EDIT: Link to the Register's discussion:
VIA alleges that Intel's behaviour is "anti-competitive, that the way Intel uses its huge patent portfolio seriously harms smaller rivals, and that Intel is driving rivals out of business and harming consumers".

According to Pat Treacy, head of the Competition law at group Bristows, the Appeal Court's decision will ensure a "landmark trial" in which "momentous issues" concerning the conflicts between competition law and the patent law will be explored.

Bristows has produced a useful summary of the general issues at stake.

Competition law ensures that companies are free to compete, to give consumers choice of price, specification and quality. Patent law gives the
patent holder the right to stop others using his invention. Where patents block access to the entirety of a marketplace, the two systems may come into
conflict. That a patent holder's rights can sometimes be restricted by competition law is controversial. Claims of this sort have historically been viewed with scepticism by some UK Courts. ®
The two companies have a long-running battle over the rights of VIA to use Intel-patents in P4 chipsets and mobos. They are slugging it out courts on three continents.
 
Well, I will never buy a Via board but I am glad Via won. I can't stand Intel's monopolistic control over the chip and chipset industry.
 
Blah Blah Blah, How hard would it have been for Intel to grant them a license, or Via to suck it up...I don't care how big either one of them is, some of these disputes are seemingly childish...

Via doesn't seem to be doing badly, except for the SiS and NVidia press, that seems to be pushing Via aside...

I guess my rant doesn't even involve these two companies. People need to stay out of the courts so much...its just so tedious on the rest of us...
 
I might have picked up a VIA a few months ago...but with the NFORCE 2 mobo's out, they kick VIA square in the ...chips.
 
Back
Top