- Jan 22, 2002
- 295
- 0
- 0
alright, i know these chips aren't the best performance-wise, but a friend of mine just bought a laptop that takes desktop cpu's. it comes with a 400-500 mhz celeron chip inside (i don't know the exact mhz). to extend battery life and reliability, i thought i'd recommend getting a c3 chip inside. i know they run extremely cool and at a very low voltage. after researching, i found that they come in three different cores. the ezra core seems to be the newest of the bunch, so i decided to look further into that. i don't think his frontside bus will go over 100mhz, so i was looking for one that runs at that speed. after reading the specsheet, i found out that they made an ezra core cpu running at 8 x 100 and another running at 9 x 100. i believe all the others run at the higher 133 fsb. i found the 900 mhz one, but i don't know if it would run too warm. i can't seem to find the 800mhz one.
to sum things up, i'm looking for the 800 ezra (8 x 100), wondering how hot the 900 ezra (9 x 100) would run, wondering if the samuel 2 core is really that much worse, and thinking about running a 133 fsb ezra core cpu underclocked...
if anybody has any suggestions, please let me know.
to sum things up, i'm looking for the 800 ezra (8 x 100), wondering how hot the 900 ezra (9 x 100) would run, wondering if the samuel 2 core is really that much worse, and thinking about running a 133 fsb ezra core cpu underclocked...
if anybody has any suggestions, please let me know.
