Very high performance multipurpose build...

ceravis

Junior Member
Oct 2, 2007
3
0
0
Hello all - I'm relatively new to the forums, but have been consulting Anandtech's excellent articles for years... I'm amazed I've completely missed out on this community all this time...

I'm building a new system and could really use some advice from those wiser (and with more hands-on experience) than myself for a few key choices. I'm looking for the best bang for the buck: getting the lowest price isn't critical, as I'm more concerned with quality and performance, but I don't believe in spending twice the money for 10% better performance. I'll be using the system for high-res (1920x1200 when possible) gaming, music production, photoshopping, 3d rendering, and fractal flame rendering, among many other things - and to make it really interesting I'm shooting for an extremely quiet build. As a point of reference, I'm currently running a K7S5A, Athlon XP 2400+, 2x512 PC2100, & a 6800GT AGP 4x, so pretty much any new system would eat this thing for breakfast.

Luckily, there's a little room in the budget atm, so I've been researching parts for the new build. However, I'm still torn on a few decisions, and I would greatly appreciate any feedback.



What I've purchased so far:

Case: Antec P180b - Bought this about 9 months ago for the current system to improve noise/cooling and love it; will reuse for new build. Can't recommend this (or P182) highly enough.

RAM: 2x1gb OCZ Reaper HPC 4-4-4-15 1T - Impulse bought for $50 AR, should have held out for some Patriot or Ballistix 4-4-4-12's at same price, but ce la vie. I suspect the "cooling" arrangement on these is next to useless, especially since the less than ideal radiators on top look like they will cause significant turbulence in the airpath in front of the CPU fan and ultimately reduce overall airflow. Anyone get good results from these?

Monitor: Dell 2407WFP-HC Rev A00 - After months of drooling, I finally blew my wad on this a couple weeks ago when it dropped to just over $600 after tax & shipping. I'm a die-hard CRT fan, coming from a Sony G500 21", but this is a bloody beautiful LCD, great colors and image quality with Desktop preset, Brightness and Contrast both at 45, and Custom RGB set to 90-90-90. Bright reds and greens can still be a bit eye-searing compared to the Sony CRT, but I plan to borrow a calibration setup (or at least try some profiles from the net) to tone this down. Very nice blacks, but could use a slightly more effective anti-reflective coating if there are lights behind you. No dead pixels, no "ghosting" unless contrast is cranked, though I haven't tried a real dark, contrasty game like Doom 3 yet. However, fine text isn't quite as smooth as the Sony CRT (even with ClearType tuned), though I expected this. Although it took 2 weeks to get here (ordered 9/19, shipped 10/2, arrived 10/4), it still got here 8 days sooner than Dell's estimate ;).



What I plan to purchase:

CPU: Q6600 G0 - Decided on this over faster dual-cores because of sufficient game performance after overclocking, and more cores = more future proof. In addition, more cores = better performance rendering and multitasking outside of games.

HSF: Thermalright 120 Ultra Extreme w/ Scythe S-FLEX F - The TR120UX HS seems at or near the top of all the lists cooling-wise, and lets me choose my own fan. The SFF21F fan is very quiet (can speed down quieter than stock if OCing allows) and reliable.

PSU: Corsair 620 HX or 520 HX - Universally hailed as one of the best in performance, quality, and noise. Will get 620 if I go the SLI route, otherwise 520.



What I'm having trouble with:

Video: EVGA 8800GTS 320 or 640 Superclocked - The only reason I'm leaning toward EVGA is the insurance policy of the Step Up program in case G92 turns out to be, well, a significant step up ;) Otherwise, the MSI 8800GTS 640 is only $320 AR which seems to be best bang for the buck for high-res atm. I'm leaning away from the cheaper 320 part since it is on the way out, and may be scarce (or nonexistent) a year or two from now when I want to pick up a second one cheap to SLI. However, I've heard (more than once) that SLI isn't worth the money/power/heat - would I be better off selling the single card in a year or two and buying a replacement single faster card? Should I just avoid SLI altogether?

Mobo - SLI: EVGA 680i A1 - A bit pricey, waiting for another $20+ rebate to come along, but really like the feature set of this board plus the flexibility of throwing in a second 8800GTS when funds allow. I've heard that the Nvidia chipsets don't overclock as well as Intel's, but the SLI support is the dealmaker here.

Mobo - non-SLI: Abit IP35 Pro or Gigabyte P35-DS4 Rev2 - If I scrap the SLI idea completely, the IP35 Pro jumps to first place, with Gigabyte's DS4r2 a very close second. It seems either of these would be an excellent choice for OCing, reliability, and features, though I have yet to see much objective information on the DS4. Any votes for or against either of these?



General advice needed:

RAID 0 for the system drive: Anyone out there doing this? I'm thinking of just striping a couple 400gb Samsung SpinPoints for the system's only partition (OS, programs, and data), with the OS install and data backed up regularly in case of physical drive failure. However, it seems many systems I see with RAID setups use a single fast (loud) standalone drive for the OS and a striped RAID for the programs & data. I want to keep down costs, noise, and heat by using only a total of 2 hard drives - is this wise/feasible?



Thanks very much for any tips and advice. I only tend to build a new system every 4-5 years, and want to make sure I measure twice and cut once ;)
 

phaxmohdem

Golden Member
Aug 18, 2004
1,839
0
0
www.avxmedia.com
I'd definately go with the 640MB version if possible, if you plan on playing games such as Crysis and whatnot that would benefit from the extra texture memory. I've never used a GTS before, but my GTX card is awesome and I'd recommend it to anyone. AS for the motherboard, just take a lookat what you really need/want feature wise. I have an SLI board, but do not run SLI on it. However, I have a 6600GT filling the second slot, helping to power a 4 monitor setup. Also take into account things such as RAID-Support, and number of SATA ports, USB headers/firewire headers, and such things if they are important to you.

AS for RAID, my rig is currently running two 150GB raptors in RAID-0 as my OS/App drive, and two more hitach 500GB drives in RAID-0 as my storage drive (+ one more 400GB standalone drive for backup). Honestly it is fast, but I did not notice a huge difference (other than benchmark numbers) in performance compared to my old single 74GB raptor OS drive. And noise is not bad at all, I can't even hear the hard drives in my Antec P160 case and there are 5 of them total. The case fans & GPU fan make the vast majority of audible noise.

So long story short:

- 8800GTS 640MB
- SLI Board (If it were me choosing)
- RAID-0 the suckers.
 

oynaz

Platinum Member
May 14, 2003
2,449
3
81
I would avoid SLI. You get better performance and less trouble out of a GTX than two GTSs.

However, Phaxmohdem's idea of the option of running 4 monitors from an SLI board sounds nice. I run Cubase and Reason when making music, and normally have a text editor and a browser open as well. 4 monitors would be nice ;-)

Raid 0 is not worth it IMO. You quadruple your error rate for a very slight performance increase.
 

Blain

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
23,643
3
81
Originally posted by: ceravis
Very high performance multipurpose build...

I'm looking for the best bang for the buck: getting the lowest price isn't critical, as I'm more concerned with quality and performance, but I don't believe in spending twice the money for 10% better performance.

Thanks very much for any tips and advice. I only tend to build a new system every 4-5 years, and want to make sure I measure twice and cut once ;)
Which is it... "Very high performance" or "best bang for the buck"? :shocked:


 

MarcVenice

Moderator Emeritus <br>
Apr 2, 2007
5,664
0
0
SLI is a waste of money, it's only usefull to people who want to SLI 2 gtx's right now, meaning you go for uber overkill with 2 high-end videocards. In a year or so you're better of getting 1 whole new videocard that will blow 2 gts's away. You get a better mobo if you don't go SLI, and you don't need a huge PSU to cover for the possibility of going SLI. And since you're on the cheap here, and allready have a 600$ LCD, I doubt you are going to be purchasing more monitors anytime soon.

And if you are keeping down costs, I wouldn't do raid. Not worth the hassle if you ask me. I'd go with a single 500gb samsung spinpoint. They are considerably quieter and cooler then their smaller counterparts, and are pretty fast too.
 

ceravis

Junior Member
Oct 2, 2007
3
0
0
Thanks very much everyone for all the input - can't believe it's taken me so long to reply. I'm really sorry, but the more research I do the more indecisive I become ;)

SLI / video situation: I'm seeing the light on this - I guess I've never considered the feasibility of ebaying my used vid cards and such to replace them with faster versions well before they become obsolete and worthless, simply because I have reservations about buying used compy parts (have they been handled safely ESD-wise, not been overclocked excessively, etc.). But I think I'm going to go the single card route and budget to replace it every 1-2 years.

However, at this point I'm going to sit on my hands and wait for the G92 to materialize. If it indeed turns out to be faster, cheaper, cooler, and quieter than the current 8800GTS, then I'd be crazy not to wait another month (or less).

RAID: Considering the extra expense, install complexity, heat/sound issues, data loss potential and migration headaches down the road, I just don't think I'm going to go this route. Just going to keep it simple with a single Spinpoint for OS/apps/games, and likely a NAS with USB backup for my hundreds of gigs of photos, video, music, and other irreplaceable data. And I guess I just keep reading everywhere that RAID-0 is fast in theory, but just not that much noticeably faster in practice to justify the expense, risks, and extra work.

@Blain: I guess I'm trying to straddle the gray area between bang-for-the-buck and high performance - I want to have my cake and eat it too ;) I just don't want to spend any more than I have to to build a system that will last me as long as my current good 'ol Athlon 2400 has (approx 5 yrs now, excepting the upgrade from GeForce ti4200 to 6800GT in mid-2004).

Again, thanks very much to all of you for the feedback - I'll update here when I take the next step.
 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
Originally posted by: Blain

Which is it... "Very high performance" or "best bang for the buck"? :shocked:

I thought the same thing until I actually read the post...

I don't think it is unreasonable to want a high performance PC, but not overkill by having to spend a ton more money for a smaller increase in performance. law of diminishing returns