- Jun 30, 2004
- 16,333
- 1,888
- 126
There are various issues at play in my question: for instance, whether I'd chosen to go "custom-water" or "strictly air-cooling."
I've run all the benchies and stress tests on my system for the graphics card -- a Gigabyte GTX 1070 Mini OC.
Running Furmark at a room ambient of 75F, that card equilibrates to 70C after 10 minutes and doesn't exceed it.
Of course I know these are acceptable temperatures, no less for using one of Giga's Extreme Engine profiles.
Those profiles don't seem to much vary in either voltage or speed. That is, the differences aren't going to make it much hotter or cooler. Only manual tuning would do that.
How good, how "average" etc. are those temperatures? I would think any GTX 1070 without water-cooling would be a decent basis for comparison. If your case cooling strategy is inferior to mine, I'd think my temperatures would be better. But I'm just fishing for an idea of the Furmark results.
I've run all the benchies and stress tests on my system for the graphics card -- a Gigabyte GTX 1070 Mini OC.
Running Furmark at a room ambient of 75F, that card equilibrates to 70C after 10 minutes and doesn't exceed it.
Of course I know these are acceptable temperatures, no less for using one of Giga's Extreme Engine profiles.
Those profiles don't seem to much vary in either voltage or speed. That is, the differences aren't going to make it much hotter or cooler. Only manual tuning would do that.
How good, how "average" etc. are those temperatures? I would think any GTX 1070 without water-cooling would be a decent basis for comparison. If your case cooling strategy is inferior to mine, I'd think my temperatures would be better. But I'm just fishing for an idea of the Furmark results.
Last edited: