Cloned the old HDD to an SSD using Acronis. Seems to work fine but then I ran AS SSD.

Now the read/write speeds are, according to what I've Google'd, normal for a Vertex 3 on SATA II. Even OCZ's spec sheet says as much.
But does SATA II have to do with the access speeds, because every single benchmark I've seen has far better access times than what I've benchmarked?
For what it's worth, the SSD appears to be aligned properly. Checking disks in system information, I have two partitions on the SSD, the 100MB partition that W7 made for whatever reason on the old HDD and the big boot partition. Both have "Partition Starting Offset" values that are divisible by 4096.
Any insight would be appreciated.

Now the read/write speeds are, according to what I've Google'd, normal for a Vertex 3 on SATA II. Even OCZ's spec sheet says as much.
But does SATA II have to do with the access speeds, because every single benchmark I've seen has far better access times than what I've benchmarked?
For what it's worth, the SSD appears to be aligned properly. Checking disks in system information, I have two partitions on the SSD, the 100MB partition that W7 made for whatever reason on the old HDD and the big boot partition. Both have "Partition Starting Offset" values that are divisible by 4096.
Any insight would be appreciated.
