• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

venice or winchester for amd 64 3000+?

it all depends sort of. sometimes the winnie is better, sometimes the venice. i think if you go venice, youll have a better chance at getting a good overclock.
 
well, there isnt much of a difference, except you can run ddr400 with 4 sticks of ram and it has SSE3 instructions (which doesnt make any real difference with most apps) the venice has a very good reputation for overclocking, better than the winchester, even tho it is really impressive too. i would go for the venice, newer is better usualy. also, the price is relitively the same.
 
Venice is better SSE3, cache improvements, higher clocks.

I think it's worth $20 more.. what's the price differential?
 
WinChesters were great, but Venice is even better, since the venice is only $8 more it is a no brainer, go with the Venice.

PS - I hope my Winchester chip does not read this as he has/is serving me well 🙂 !!!!!
 
Originally posted by: sangyup81
Winchesters don't overclock as well as they used to. Go with Venice
Click to expand...

So seems to be the case. All the more reason to go Venice if you're overclocking. If not, it's just $8.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top