venice 3000 v 3200 for my rig

[cazicthule]

Which to choose for this rig? I will be overclocking and the purpose is only to game. I have another computer I use for multitasking

AMD64 3000 or 3200 venice

DFI Lanparty nf4 ultra or non ultra - deciding
2x1gb OCZ platinum ram - purchased
BFG 7800GT OC - purchased
Neopower 480w - purchased
SLK3000B or P180 - deciding
xp90 with silentcat fan - purchased
200gb seagate IDE hd - have
80gb wd IDE hd - have

Hopefully can finish ordering the parts today.

 

[valkator]

I would shoot for the 3000 since it is cheaper and it can pretty much OC about as good as the 3200+ I have the 3200+ @ 2.5GHz well a winnie though and well lots of people can take the 3000+ as far or even further.

 

[cazicthule]

Hilarious sig

 

[theMan]

if you can spend it, get a 3700+ SD.

how about Windows FU

 

[valkator]

actually i did have windows FU on there before but i changed it so that i dont get ragged on by an AT mod lol.

 

[cazicthule]

Originally posted by: theman
if you can spend it, get a 3700+ SD.

how about Windows FU

What is your reasoning for this?

how about iWindows or Windows X(P) or Windows Tiger

 

[theMan]

windows YJGS (you're just got screwed)
windows Bill Gates Signature Edition
windows Emc^2 (makes it seem intelligent)
windows bluescreen (hey that sounds pretty cool)
windows LONGHORN (goddamnit! just keep it as longhorn!)
windows theman edition (hell yeah)
windows BFG9000

 

[coomar]

the san diego will overclock higher and has 1mg cache

however the 3000 should hit 2.6 which is more than enough for your 7800 (which needs at least 2.2)