- Sep 6, 2005
- 3,822
- 1
- 81
So, we have plenty of discussion about AMD vs Nvidia, about performance for price, most of which go in circles.
How about a different topic... between the same company, but different brands? How do we decide where the value of a GPU ends? For example, my traditional viewpoint is that up until the top-end GPU (7970/680), it is always more economic to get the cheapest possible brand of a single GPU, because any money placed into that same GPU can be put towards the next tier.
I remember hearing the opinion of a user on another forum who was adamant about getting higher quality brands. Something along the lines of saying paying $250 for a top-end 7870 was a better choice than getting a $250 Powercolor 7870 XT.
Where do we draw the line between putting money into a single tier? Would a $330 Asus 7950 still be a worthwhile, considering a XFX 7970 can be had for $350?
How about a different topic... between the same company, but different brands? How do we decide where the value of a GPU ends? For example, my traditional viewpoint is that up until the top-end GPU (7970/680), it is always more economic to get the cheapest possible brand of a single GPU, because any money placed into that same GPU can be put towards the next tier.
I remember hearing the opinion of a user on another forum who was adamant about getting higher quality brands. Something along the lines of saying paying $250 for a top-end 7870 was a better choice than getting a $250 Powercolor 7870 XT.
Where do we draw the line between putting money into a single tier? Would a $330 Asus 7950 still be a worthwhile, considering a XFX 7970 can be had for $350?
Last edited: