So, why would you ever use the primary fire? Am I right to think that secondary would be better when at range, allowing for more accuracy?Originally posted by: thenerdguy
faster firing rate less damage
slower firing rate higher damage.
Originally posted by: sxftdeep
Why not use primary fire when you're up-close-and-personal. I always do. If you can jump around and strafe better than your oppenent while dodging his fire, you're going to be pumping a lot more ammo into him then he will be into you.
At distance, yeah, secondary fire is definitely the viable option.
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: sxftdeep
Why not use primary fire when you're up-close-and-personal. I always do. If you can jump around and strafe better than your oppenent while dodging his fire, you're going to be pumping a lot more ammo into him then he will be into you.
At distance, yeah, secondary fire is definitely the viable option.
I hear you there, well the answer is, I try not to use the minigun if I have other guns available(Flak Cannon)
![]()
Originally posted by: rmrf
personally, I like the lightning gun from a distance. when I'm up close and personal, I like to grab one of the vehicles and do some hit and runs.
Originally posted by: Dufman
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: sxftdeep
Why not use primary fire when you're up-close-and-personal. I always do. If you can jump around and strafe better than your oppenent while dodging his fire, you're going to be pumping a lot more ammo into him then he will be into you.
At distance, yeah, secondary fire is definitely the viable option.
I hear you there, well the answer is, I try not to use the minigun if I have other guns available(Flak Cannon)
![]()
I like the mini. But the Flak rocks too
Originally posted by: Vaerilis
I use secondary fire against vehicles and slow moving players. More damage, less ammo wasted.
