Using Windows XP Home OS for very small business environment?

badboyeee

Senior member
Nov 12, 2001
664
0
0

I will be getting a new Dell budget system to replace one of the computers at work. Do I really need to get Windows XP Professional for a really small non-tech business environment? 80% of our 12 computers have WinXP Pro, but I really don't see the need to spend the extra $149 Dell is charging to upgrade from Home to Pro. It will only do basic things and networking (share files/printers)...
 

MrChad

Lifer
Aug 22, 2001
13,507
3
81
I would get Professional. When and if you need a server such as Small Business Server, you'll want Professional licenses on your workstations.
 

futuristicmonkey

Golden Member
Feb 29, 2004
1,031
0
76
DO NOT EVER BUY XP HOME.

It's garbage, and soon it won't be supported by Microsoft. I know soon is alittle vague, but I don't feel like researching it.

Oh, and XP Home is complete garbage. You don't want to have a transaction messed up because for some damn reason XP feels like it doesn't want to communicate with the rest of the internet. Do yourself a favour and shell out a bit more for Professional.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
Oh, and XP Home is complete garbage. You don't want to have a transaction messed up because for some damn reason XP feels like it doesn't want to communicate with the rest of the internet. Do yourself a favour and shell out a bit more for Professional.

This is complete crap, the TCP/IP stack is exactly the same in Pro and Home. There is no reason that Home would fail to contact a host that Pro couldn't, unless of course the tool being used puts the artificial limitation that it only works on Pro.
 

skyking

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
22,581
5,650
146
The most important reason I can think of is consistency. Home can do most of the things Pro can do, with the exception of remote desktop connection.
I prefer setting up a network with the same configurations and OS's for regular maintenance and upgrade.
 

RebateMonger

Elite Member
Dec 24, 2005
11,586
0
0
Go with XP Pro. I just finished upgrading two office PCs from XP Home to XP Professional to work with a client's new Windows Server. The upgrade cost/time is FAR higher than the extra $150 to get XP Pro originally. A 12-PC office is due for a Server soon, and you'll save a lot of money by starting wth XP Pro in the first place.
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
1
0
Dell used to charge $60-$70 to go from Home to Pro. You can buy a new Pro OEM for less than $149.
 

spherrod

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2003
3,897
0
0
www.steveherrod.com
Originally posted by: futuristicmonkey
DO NOT EVER BUY XP HOME.

It's garbage, and soon it won't be supported by Microsoft. I know soon is alittle vague, but I don't feel like researching it.

Oh, and XP Home is complete garbage. You don't want to have a transaction messed up because for some damn reason XP feels like it doesn't want to communicate with the rest of the internet. Do yourself a favour and shell out a bit more for Professional.

:roll:

XP Home is fine for small, non-domain environments and the 'Home' user.

For the Op, if you know what the future direction of the business is going to be then that might help make your choice. If there's any prospect of a domain being set up then go with XP Pro.
 

futuristicmonkey

Golden Member
Feb 29, 2004
1,031
0
76
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Oh, and XP Home is complete garbage. You don't want to have a transaction messed up because for some damn reason XP feels like it doesn't want to communicate with the rest of the internet. Do yourself a favour and shell out a bit more for Professional.

This is complete crap, the TCP/IP stack is exactly the same in Pro and Home. There is no reason that Home would fail to contact a host that Pro couldn't, unless of course the tool being used puts the artificial limitation that it only works on Pro.

I wasn't trying to imply that the background programming was any different - it's just that in my experience XP Pro allows you more control (rather, your instructions seem to be paid more attention) than does Home. The part I bolded is what I wanted to get across - though in my experience XP Pro is more consistent in its fvcking up when you try to connect to a network share.

Hardly a scientific argurment, I grant, but XP Home is a schizophrenic sumbitch compared to Professional.

Originally posted by: spherrod
XP Home is fine for small, non-domain environments and the 'Home' user.

Yes - too bad it's going to be used in a business environment.