I didn't miss the point at all, I was just making some of my own.
I am in the exact same position. I can not get any kind of DSL service, same goes for Cable. I guess I could get Satellite, but I don't want to! It would suck, badly.
ISDN does suck, though. Grossly overpriced for what you get. Satellite is overpriced as well, but mainly because it's aimed to the people who need an alternative to dialup and can't use ADSL or Cable, or won't for some reason.
It sucks though... Until they start offering 2-way Satellite without all those restrictions and for at least $10 less per month and a cheaper installation fee, etc etc, I won't consider it.
Well the main thing that threw me off was the 60 hours per month thing. That's ludicrous! I use over 150 hours per month on dialup (well, family of 5), how on earth would 60 hours per month be sufficient?
My school got Satellite internet now. They must have cut a special deal with the company in order to get unlimited time and more bandwidth or something, otherwise they'd be in trouble.

It does seem better than cable though, which is what they had before. I guess it's better for their situation. They have 30+ computers connected to it.
When they used to have cable, if I tried to download an mp3 or something, it would constantly
stop and transfer errors were frequent. Now, the general transfer rate is higher and stays up there instead of stopping and going down.
The ping is horrible on Satellite though. I saw 600-2800ms regularly. When they had cable, I pinged 30-40ms.
And again, no I did not miss the point!
-RSI