First, Thx for explaining icarus4586... but i do have more questions if you dont mind.
Second, i wasnt insaulting anyone.. i clearly stated that it was just my opinion that the replys didnt fit with the HT section... i did however insault Bigsm00th, cause hes clearly just spamming thus far.
Originally posted by: icarus4586
do you mean induction can staticly charge non-antistatic plastic?
Well, it can, but induction happens when there's a static charge close to an uncharged object. It won't happen when there's a current flowing past an uncharged object, which would be the case in what I think you're talking about. Thus molexes don't acquire a static charge.
maybe i just dont understand something but..... i was thinking inturms of the field around the wire of the molex expanding and colapsing everytime u turn on/off the computer... might that possibly just for fictitious example- creat a imbalance of the stray electrons riding on the plastic surface.. thus causing static buildup... or possibly something?
Originally posted by: icarus4586
since plastic is not conductive, why do you say it would conduct current in series
I didn't. It won't. If there is a conductor with a large electrical charge that
is not in a circuit with something else, but is contacting your plastic, the part of the plastic touching it will become charged. It will not conduct electricity. Static electricity is
non-moving charge. Current is
moving charge.
ok, thats were u confused me befor... i thought you were talking about an electric circuit, because u said in *series... you didnt mention that u meant a (staticly charged conductor) a conductor just for example - a large battery that carrys a very high elecrical charge will not charge plastic or anything at all for that matter, as an open circuit that is.
Originally posted by: icarus4586If I was the first person to have seen your post, I would have told you to move it somewhere other than HT, because it's really not HT.
that could be an opinion.
-----------------------------------------
Bigsm00th <-- you are clearly just riding my thread likea spam train... if you have a problem with me, just dont look at my thread. (spam is agains HT rules anyway i think, thats one of the reasons i posted it here)
but just to make it clear.....
Originally posted by: Bigsm00thman you really are stupid. you can get shocked from a camera flash circuit easily considering they run at 300+ volts and are charged from a AA. voltage isnt what kills you though. its the current. i would have expected you to know that since you know so much about electricity. :thumbsdown:
That just mean you dont understand Basic electronics...
1) an AA battery is NOT 300 volts
2) you may have never seen this but... (E/I|R) <-- that means you cant change 1 factor without afecting the rest.. your camera is not a magical device creating 300+volts from a AA Bat.... For example- if its power source is a 1.2v batt at 2a = 2.4watts and it transforms it to 300v... 2.4w/300 = .008 amp
Originally posted by: Bigsm00thoh, and low voltage batteries can create current through you if you are wet. put a 9v on your tongue and see what happens. now do that with a battery with much higher current output potential and see what happens. it only takes 50mA to kill you and batteries are definitely capable of outputting that current for a short amount of time.
1)if your wet the current is not traveling threw you, its traveling threw the water on top of the skin.
2)i dont just have stray batterys laying around, especialy 9v... but i already know you wont feel anything, because the average human body resistence is 30,000ohms.. so 9/30000 = .0003a
3)im glad im not you, because it takes much less then 50mA to kill a person. its about 1 or 2mA thats needed to kill someone.