Originally posted by: zinfamous
nope, as far as I know. the PS3 is generally considered the future-proof Blu Ray player. I've got one and I love it.
Originally posted by: zinfamous
nope, as far as I know. the PS3 is generally considered the future-proof Blu Ray player. I've got one and I love it.
Originally posted by: CMC79
Originally posted by: zinfamous
nope, as far as I know. the PS3 is generally considered the future-proof Blu Ray player. I've got one and I love it.
Agreed. I have been very happy with mine, although I'd recommend buying the remote control for it--using the PS3 controller gets old quick.
Originally posted by: Kaspian
Originally posted by: zinfamous
nope, as far as I know. the PS3 is generally considered the future-proof Blu Ray player. I've got one and I love it.
What do you mean by "future proof"?
Thank you for your input.
Kas
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Kaspian
Originally posted by: zinfamous
nope, as far as I know. the PS3 is generally considered the future-proof Blu Ray player. I've got one and I love it.
What do you mean by "future proof"?
Thank you for your input.
Kas
profile 1.1+ compatible. all Blu Ray players manufactured before 10/26/07 (or whatever that date) are not required to be profile 1.1 compatible. what this requires (iirc) is nothing more than ample storage space and a little bit of hardware. the PS3 is the only (i think there may be another) Blu Ray player that meets these specs.
1.1, 2.0 and all those improve menu and special feature functions on BDs (needs Java). What this means, is that many early adopters will be stuck with $600 pieces of hardware that don't play the newly-released discs. (technically, it should only effect the special features, but there are ample reports of Java-enabled BDs that don't play on certain Blu Ray players--PoTC 2, FF 2, Spidey 3....)
HD DVD pretty much already has this standardized capability, which is the big slam against Blu Ray.
Originally posted by: kalrith
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Kaspian
Originally posted by: zinfamous
nope, as far as I know. the PS3 is generally considered the future-proof Blu Ray player. I've got one and I love it.
What do you mean by "future proof"?
Thank you for your input.
Kas
profile 1.1+ compatible. all Blu Ray players manufactured before 10/26/07 (or whatever that date) are not required to be profile 1.1 compatible. what this requires (iirc) is nothing more than ample storage space and a little bit of hardware. the PS3 is the only (i think there may be another) Blu Ray player that meets these specs.
1.1, 2.0 and all those improve menu and special feature functions on BDs (needs Java). What this means, is that many early adopters will be stuck with $600 pieces of hardware that don't play the newly-released discs. (technically, it should only effect the special features, but there are ample reports of Java-enabled BDs that don't play on certain Blu Ray players--PoTC 2, FF 2, Spidey 3....)
HD DVD pretty much already has this standardized capability, which is the big slam against Blu Ray.
If the PS3 is profile 1.1+ compatible, will it play the new discs that come out a few years from now when the standard is 2.0, for example?
To the OP, there are two things that the PS3 lacks. One is an IR remote. You can buy a bluetooth remote for it, but if you want to use a universal IR remote with it, you have to work a little harder at it. This thread at avsforum shows you how to make it.
The second thing it doesn't have is coaxial outputs for each individual channel. This means that the only way to get Dolby TrueHD and the DTS variant is with an HDMI receiver. With individual coaxial outputs you could run a cable for each from the bluray player to a non-HDMI receiver and get the HD sound.
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
i think BT for remote is awesome. no direct line of sight needed.
It spoils me. Well, so does the white walls in the bedroom I can point the ir remote *anywhere* and it'll find it's way to the tv's receiver.Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
i think BT for remote is awesome. no direct line of sight needed.
Originally posted by: thegimp03
I got one on Sunday (the 80GB) - am very happy with it so far and it's a nice addition to the setup in my room. I decided against getting a stand-alone player because if Blu-Ray doesn't pan out for some reason, a stand-alone player is defunct while a PS3 will be usable for years to come as a gaming machine as well as a great upconverting DVD player.
.
Originally posted by: Kaspian
Originally posted by: thegimp03
I got one on Sunday (the 80GB) - am very happy with it so far and it's a nice addition to the setup in my room. I decided against getting a stand-alone player because if Blu-Ray doesn't pan out for some reason, a stand-alone player is defunct while a PS3 will be usable for years to come as a gaming machine as well as a great upconverting DVD player.
.
I came back in to ask if the PS3 also upconvert regular DVDs. By reading your reply, I guess it does.
Kas
Originally posted by: sciencewhiz
IR
Originally posted by: Kaspian
Besides the size of the hardrive (40 vs 80 gigs), are there any other differences between the two available PS3 models? Does the more expensive one (80gigs) has any "extras"?
Kas
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: Kaspian
Besides the size of the hardrive (40 vs 80 gigs), are there any other differences between the two available PS3 models? Does the more expensive one (80gigs) has any "extras"?
Kas
Differences amongst PS3 models, note that if you are in north america, you are using NTSC.