Useful Standards Site for Web Developers

PhatoseAlpha

Platinum Member
Apr 10, 2005
2,131
21
81
Sheesh. Thing honestly looks like justification for not using any of those things.
 

Markbnj

Elite Member <br>Moderator Emeritus
Moderator
Sep 16, 2005
15,682
14
81
www.markbetz.net
Sheesh. Thing honestly looks like justification for not using any of those things.

It ain't the best looking design I've ever seen. In terms of functionality I'm just not sure I get it. You go there, it tells you your IP, and reports what browser you're using and what it's capabilities are. It's briefly interesting, but doubt whether it has any long-term utility.

If the poster had been a new account I probably would have considered this spam, since posting just to solicit traffic for another site makes the Matrix unhappy.
 

Ka0t1x

Golden Member
Jan 23, 2004
1,724
0
71
The litmus (second link) is actually pretty useful as long as its updated regularly.
 

GaryJohnson

Senior member
Jun 2, 2006
940
0
0
The litmus (second link) is actually pretty useful as long as its updated regularly.

That's just it though, you can't be sure whether it's being updated regularly. The author doesn't cite any sources, and the site isn't reputable enough to be blindly trusted. There are other litmus lists out there (there's are several in wikipedia I think) that would be better to use IMHO.

These lists are really just a curiosity anyhow; you still need to test in every target browser. They might all support a feature, but there could be quirks with their implementation or they might all handle a coding mistake with that feature differently.
 

Chiefcrowe

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2008
5,056
199
116
true.. it could be a nice quick reference if the 2nd link is updated. I got it from another web developer and though i'd pass it on. You're right, it doesn't substitute for testing things yourself either.