USC Football Appeal - DENIED (5/25)

Status
Not open for further replies.

dr150

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2003
6,570
24
81
USC Football about to get bent over tomorrow (Thursday).

Up next, Ohio State....


http://usc.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1225393

May 25, 2011

USC Trojans NCAA Appeal Denied


It's been more than 11 months since the NCAA Committee on Infractions hit USC with the harshest penalties in the modern era of college football since the "death penalty" meted out to SMU in 1987.

Wednesday, according to multiple sources inside and outside the university, the final decision of the NCAA's Infractions Appeals Committee was in hand and being reviewed by USC before its Thursday release by the NCAA.

And it's not good news for USC football.

Despite speculation and media reports that there might be a willingness on the part of the NCAA to listen favorably to a USC appeal that had asked that the 30 scholarships lost over three years with a maximum of 75 allowed and a two-year postseason bowl ban be cut in half, USCFootball.com's sources indicate that USC's appeal has been denied completely.

The Trojans football team will be allowed to sign no more than 15 players to scholarships for the next three seasons (against a top limit of 25 for schools not under sanction).

And of even more immediate impact, USC would not be able to compete for the first-ever Pac-12 championship or appear in the first-ever postseason championship game in 2011 as well.

Of further concern, the NCAA's unprecedented additional sanction allowing players affected by the postseason ban this year to immediately transfer to another institution without sitting out a season would still be in play for this year's seniors.

While USC did not release the appeal it filed with the NCAA for its Jan. 25 hearing, the hope has been that the NCAA's favorable treatment of both Ohio State and Auburn, who were allowed to play in this year's BCS bowl games despite serious allegations against each program, would play in USC's favor.

At the time in Indianapolis, USC Pres. Max Nikias said: "All I will say is that I want to thank the NCAA for giving us an opportunity before the appeals committee to have a good and fair hearing. Now we have to wait for the ruling."

Now that they have the ruling, it appears much in line with the complete denial the NCAA's Infractions Appeals Committee made in the case of former USC assistant Todd McNair three weeks ago. And while McNair has clearly reserved the right to consider a lawsuit against the NCAA for a number of mistakes in his case, USC Athletics Director Pat Haden had removed that possibility from the school's potential responses.

"A lot of people say it's going to help you," Haden said of the Auburn and Ohio State cases in January before the hearing. "I don't think so. I don't think it helps or hurts us; I think it's irrelevant.

"This is it," Haden said of further action by USC. "There is no appeal after this . . . This is the final frontier."

USC did issue a statement on receiving the appeal Wednesday afternoon saying that "USC has received a response from the NCAA regarding our appeal of NCAA sanctions. However, under NCAA rules, we cannot comment on this response until the NCAA releases the decision to the public tomorrow morning (May 26)."
 
Last edited:

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
I wonder how many of USC's recruits are going to poached by other teams after this becaomes official.

I must think an awful lot of 2010 recruits are gonna split.

As far as Auburn and OSU, it was a travesty that they got to go to bowls. I suppose the NCAA didn't want to screw up the bowls too (punishing the innocents too etc). However, I'm hearing lots of rumors about both programs getting a seriously big smack down by the NCAA in the future.

Look for new allegations against OSU hitting the news soon.

Fern
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
It's funny to see these bandwagon USC fans react to this. They're the same people that like the Lakers.
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,223
136
Too bad for USC....may never fully recover from this. What's really sad about this whole situation is that the true guilty parties are both in their respective cities, laughing.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
36
91
It's funny to see these bandwagon USC fans react to this. They're the same people that like the Lakers.

Actually hating USC and the Lakers is just about as "bandwagon" as liking them.

So you are pretty much the conformist that you love to hate.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Too bad for USC....may never fully recover from this. What's really sad about this whole situation is that the true guilty parties are both in their respective cities, laughing.


they'll recover, this isn't SMU we're talking about.
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
Too bad for USC....may never fully recover from this. What's really sad about this whole situation is that the true guilty parties are both in their respective cities, laughing.
on a bed of money.

edit: also, USC signed 22 this year. The ogre was apparently selling a lot of them on the idea that the appeal would get the sanctions reduced. Now they have to cut 7. Not sure what happens to them.
 
Last edited:

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
As a Wolverine and a Badger, I await this news eagerly. Any teasers...?

My guess would be, simply, shit. :p

Yeah, think the story is gonna break next week in S.I.

I've heard 'play for pay' (illegal money to players). Drug use and drug dealing by players. Recruiting violations. Hiring women to provide sex for players.

Fern
 

Gibsons

Lifer
Aug 14, 2001
12,530
35
91
Just heard that they'll be able to keep all their commits for this year. Limiting them to six in the coming year's class. That's gonna hurt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.