• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

USB or PS/2 for mouse?

USB. There's the myth that PS/2 has an "adjustable poll rate", but that's only because PS/2 is the much more brainless port, requiring the user to balance mouse smoothness against I/O bandwidth used. USB is the much more efficient port, has no such issues and lets the mouse do its best without hogging ridiculous amounts of system I/O bandwidth.
 
i just use PS/2 because it won't take up a USB port, not that it matters. i think USB's benefits are unnecessary with standard mice
 
There's proggies to speed up the PS2 rate for 1 Mouse and Linux Code as USB is theoretically faster, whether it needs the OCable speed is debatable as I have felt/seen much difference.
 
USB - because you can hot plug it if necessary. PS/2 can't do that.
 
Originally posted by: corky-g
USB - because you can hot plug it if necessary. PS/2 can't do that.

Sure it can! I mean, it might damage the port and the mouse, but you can do it if you want to. 😛

I switched to USB from PS/2 for my mouse (without changing the mouse) and I think that the movement got smoother. That, and as Peter said, the PS/2 port is an ancient piece of junk.
 
I think you will find that a lot of the software for the media keys etc won't work when connected to PS2.
 
PS/2 has a 200hz refreshrate while USB have a 125hz refreshrate. There is this big debate going on that say that the PS/2 refresh fluctuates while the USB one is steady. Others say both fluctuate, I say try what you like but for me the PS/2 port is more steady. Also you get an additional slider with the logitech drivers that allow you to choose 200hz refresh, this slider is not present with USB.
 
See above. I explained already what this "refresh rate" hype really boils down to, and why the choice is absent with USB.
 
Originally posted by: Peter
See above. I explained already what this "refresh rate" hype really boils down to, and why the choice is absent with USB.

Yeah but then you are stuck with 125hz aren´t you?
 
Back
Top