USB 3.0 faster than internal SATA

Baked

Lifer
Dec 28, 2004
36,052
17
81
Setup is in my sig. I recently acquired a new larger SSD to store my games on. I had it connected to my system using a USB 3.0 docking station for the past few days, and got ATTO benchmarks of over 400MB for read and write. Today I installed that same SSD internally on the same onboard controller as my other two SSDs. Instead of seeing an increase in speed, I saw a decline. It's running at 300MB read/write now. I tried connecting it to the marvel 6GB port and it dropped the speed even more to 150MB read/write. WTF?!
 

lamedude

Golden Member
Jan 14, 2011
1,206
10
81
400MB/s (realistic USB3 speed according to spec)>300MB/s (SATA 3Gbps)
The Marvel SATA6 shares PCIe bandwidth with USB3 but it shouldn't be that slow unless you're using both at once.
 

KentState

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2001
8,397
393
126
Unless you are using an Intel SATA controller, all others will be inferior. Even the sub $200 cards typically do not perform well.
 

Baked

Lifer
Dec 28, 2004
36,052
17
81
But that's the thing. I have a pair of SSD in RAID0 attached to the same controller (this is the onboard Intel controller that comes with the chipset), and it's doing 500MB!
 

Hellhammer

AnandTech Emeritus
Apr 25, 2011
701
4
81
Your chipset (P55) only supports SATA 3Gbps so ~280MB/s is the max you can get from a single port (~550MB/s with RAID 0 using two ports). Marvell's SATA 6Gbps controllers, especially the old ones like yours, are just plain bad so 150MB/s doesn't sound surprising.