Originally posted by: DaiShan
Well that certainly is promising! There is much less of a chance of this turning into another vietnam with too few millitary personnel to carry out any type of offensive, maybe someone in this administration is actually learning from history!
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: DaiShan
Well that certainly is promising! There is much less of a chance of this turning into another vietnam with too few millitary personnel to carry out any type of offensive, maybe someone in this administration is actually learning from history!
Perhaps you would be better served not re-living history, given there will never be another Vietnam; you should study the late 60's and early 70's and figure out why we had a Vietnam-type war then and why it won't happen again.
Originally posted by: jjsole
sending 10 people to help secure a change in govt. in country battered by civil war for 10 years, wow that's stepping up to the plate in the name of humanity!
Originally posted by: DaiShan
It isn't our fight. And I realize it wasn't france's fight either (the american revolution) but they had something to gain by defeating britain.Originally posted by: jjsole sending 10 people to help secure a change in govt. in country battered by civil war for 10 years, wow that's stepping up to the plate in the name of humanity!
The US wants the West Africans to handle this and they should. We're providing some assistance and backup to a situation where everyone already knows what needs to be done and what the outcome should be. Our presence there is to motivate getting these things done, not secure the area which is best left to the West Africans. If US soldiers start to die in Liberia that means were going to become embroiled in their ongoing civil war, or face an embarrassing withdrawal, if it all blows up again.The Pentagon also sent a three-ship group with 2,000 Marines and 2,500 support sailors to stand by off the coast and be ready for any contingency, officials said. The group, headed by the amphibious assault ship USS Iwo Jima, is positioned less than 100 miles offshore, but it was unclear if those troops would have a role in Liberia.
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: DaiShan
It isn't our fight. And I realize it wasn't france's fight either (the american revolution) but they had something to gain by defeating britain.Originally posted by: jjsole sending 10 people to help secure a change in govt. in country battered by civil war for 10 years, wow that's stepping up to the plate in the name of humanity!
its not a fight, its establishing peace and order amidst what could become chaos without a peacekeeping presense. 10 is stupidest friggin thing I've heard of for a long time, especially for a country that was established by people we took as slaves.
Originally posted by: jjones
In case anyone missed this part of the story:
The US wants the West Africans to handle this and they should. We're providing some assistance and backup to a situation where everyone already knows what needs to be done and what the outcome should be. Our presence there is to motivate getting these things done, not secure the area which is best left to the West Africans. If US soldiers start to die in Liberia that means were going to become embroiled in their ongoing civil war, or face an embarrassing withdrawal, if it all blows up again.The Pentagon also sent a three-ship group with 2,000 Marines and 2,500 support sailors to stand by off the coast and be ready for any contingency, officials said. The group, headed by the amphibious assault ship USS Iwo Jima, is positioned less than 100 miles offshore, but it was unclear if those troops would have a role in Liberia.
Originally posted by: jackschmittusa
Bush sent a token force to an African nation. Wow! Now he can say he really cares about Africa (maybe even with a straight face). Now maybe Pat Robertson will tell his flock of idiots that Bush deserves their support. Even his African AIDS commitment is meerly a bone for the "abstinince only" vote.
Also to juice the quarter GDP growth by 1% so that the Bush economic team can heap praise on the economic recovery.Originally posted by: Zebo
I think american leaders are dedicated to having wars to ignore the real problems at home.
Originally posted by: Zebo
matt I appreciate your response and service but repectfully disagree. The main reasons we go to these counties is economic since we do not apply the same standards to places like Rawanda as we do Bosnia where only a fraction died and live much better in the first place. Bosnia had US businesses there, we traded with them etc so it was financially beneficial to go in much like Iraq is now for several companies and will be more so in the future. There are countless other stories of terrible suffering which we do nothing to prevent but then intervene when busniess is at stake. Cambodia, all of africa we don't seem to care about while Panama was a strategic intrest so we went in.
War is just a Racket