US should have a moon base by now.

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
I don't get it. Where is the moon base? We could have a huge underground city by now.

Are we just afraid of property rights? It could be multinational.
 

darkxshade

Lifer
Mar 31, 2001
13,749
6
81
Isn't that against some kind of international treaty? I'm pretty sure it's to forbid a sovereign claim but not sure how a "US" moon base works into that. Maybe if we built it and called it the International Moon base. :p
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Yes, we should have a moon base and we should have walked on Mars by now. Also, we should have had the Superconducting Super Collider by now and made CERN's LHC look like a child's toy.
 

Newbian

Lifer
Aug 24, 2008
24,779
882
126
Isn't that against some kind of international treaty? I'm pretty sure it's to forbid a sovereign claim but not sure how a "US" moon base works into that. Maybe if we built it and called it the International Moon base. :p

Technically no one can "claim" the moon but anyone has the right to build bases on it if you could and if you build it you can control that area.

http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/outerspt.html

It's like all those places that offer to sell you parts of the moon and why they are a scam, you own nothing until you actually build on it.

And just remember all, it will no longer be called Uranus but will be changed to Urectum in 2620.
 
Last edited:
Mar 16, 2005
13,856
109
106
bases already exist. the people there told us not to visit. that's why nasa canned the program to go back.
 

l0cke

Diamond Member
Dec 12, 2005
3,790
0
0
They want to avoid the casualties when the training VI goes rogue.
 

PM650

Senior member
Jul 7, 2009
476
2
0
bases already exist. the people there told us not to visit. that's why nasa canned the program to go back.
:hmm:


...


n2211511496_38886.jpg
 

JMapleton

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2008
4,179
2
81
They got rid of the program and any hope of a moon base because.....

IT'S A WASTE OF FREAKIN MONEY.
 

Leros

Lifer
Jul 11, 2004
21,867
7
81
Technically no one can "claim" the moon but anyone has the right to build bases on it if you could and if you build it you can control that area.

http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/outerspt.html

It's like all those places that offer to sell you parts of the moon and why they are a scam, you own nothing until you actually build on it.

And just remember all, it will no longer be called Uranus but will be changed to Urectum in 2620.

The only thing that makes a claim valid is if you have an army capable of defending your territory against invaders.

In other words, we need a moon army.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
The engineering talent that was produced from World War II died off. Kids of the 70's/80's/and 90's just kept building on technology that engineers in the 40's/50's/60's invented instead of looking for new ways to do things.

So, here we are.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Yes, we should have a moon base and we should have walked on Mars by now. Also, we should have had the Superconducting Super Collider by now and made CERN's LHC look like a child's toy.

During the late Johnson/early Nixon years, weren't they projecting a manned Mars mission by 1980? I thought I remember reading something about that. While an aggressive goal, you think we could have at least put a man on Mars sometime in the 90s if we would have had the same dedication as we did for the Apollo program.
 

HannibalX

Diamond Member
May 12, 2000
9,359
2
0
We should in fact have a moon base and be visiting Mars by now. If we had continued head strong into space like we were in the 60s and 70s vast sectors of our economy would be in the space, engineering and related industries, all the top scientist would still be in the US and we would mining natural resources on the moon.