Isn't that against some kind of international treaty? I'm pretty sure it's to forbid a sovereign claim but not sure how a "US" moon base works into that. Maybe if we built it and called it the International Moon base.![]()
:hmm:bases already exist. the people there told us not to visit. that's why nasa canned the program to go back.
Technically no one can "claim" the moon but anyone has the right to build bases on it if you could and if you build it you can control that area.
http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/outerspt.html
It's like all those places that offer to sell you parts of the moon and why they are a scam, you own nothing until you actually build on it.
And just remember all, it will no longer be called Uranus but will be changed to Urectum in 2620.
I hear Blackwater is ready.The only thing that makes a claim valid is if you have an army capable of defending your territory against invaders.
In other words, we need a moon army.
They want to avoid the casualties when the training VI goes rogue.
Yes, we should have a moon base and we should have walked on Mars by now. Also, we should have had the Superconducting Super Collider by now and made CERN's LHC look like a child's toy.
