US has nukes in Turkey?!

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/19/politics/us-nuclear-weapons-turkey-attempted-coup/index.html

The weapons are Cold War-era B-61 "gravity" bombs.

"It's an open secret" the bombs are at Incirlik, Joshua Walker of the German Marshall Fund, who specializes on US-Turkey relations, told CNN.

US also has nukes in Germany, Italy and the Netherlands. :eek:


wow.. I thought the US only had nukes in US and on nuke subs.
so how easy is it to over run a nuke base abroad?
 

jman19

Lifer
Nov 3, 2000
11,225
664
126
The US has had nukes in Europe for decades. The current stockpile is well below what it used to be. The question is if there is a real strategic need to even have them there anymore.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,245
136
LOL yes we have nukes in foreign countries. The Cuban Missile Crisis ended by way of a secret agreement whereby Russia would pull out of Cuba and in exchange we were to dismantle our IRBM's in Turkey. I'm pretty sure we'd have to have nukes to go with those missiles or Russia wouldn't have cared much.
 

mxnerd

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2007
6,799
1,103
126
Soon Trump will let Korea & Japan to have nukes, they are much responsible countries than Turkey.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
It's probably safer to hunker and lock them down where they are than try to get them out of the unstable regions they're in!

Some violent nutjobs would give almost anything to get their hands on some...
 

SOFTengCOMPelec

Platinum Member
May 9, 2013
2,417
75
91
Apparently the US personnel can (EDIT: BUT what I DON'T know. Is to what extent an out of control TURKEY can limit US access to the Nuke Storage area(s), hopefully the US has that contingency under control.) render the weapons largely unusable by activating the (non-nuclear-explosive) self destruct like mechanism, if necessary.

Which I imagine they would do, if the applicable parts of the base, become over-run with problematic people/soldiers, or they get orders from Washington and/or have to leave the base.

B61 administrative procedures performed by ground-based personnel are executed via an access panel located on the side of the bomb, which opens to reveal 9 dials, 2 sockets and a T-handle which manually triggers the "command disable" function. One of the sockets is a MC4142 "strike enable" plug which must be inserted in order to complete critical circuits in the safety/arming and firing mechanisms. The other socket is the PAL connector located in the top right hand corner of the arming panel, which has 23 pins marked with alphabetic letter codes.
The B61 also features a "command disable" mechanism, which functions as follows: after entering the correct 3-digit numeric code it is then possible to turn a dial to "DI" and pull back a T-shaped handle which comes away in the user's hand. This action releases a spring-loaded firing pin which fires the percussion cap on an MC4246A thermal battery, powering it up. Electrical power from the thermal battery is sufficient to "fry" the internal circuitry of the bomb, destroying critical mechanisms without causing detonation. This makes the bomb incapable of being used. Any B61 which has had the command disable facility used must be returned to Pantex for repair.[20]

Source:
 
Last edited:

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,490
10,763
136
Yes, members of NATO have a nuclear umbrella.
And Turkey might as well be the center of the world for its strategic position between Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,418
5,019
136
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/19/politics/us-nuclear-weapons-turkey-attempted-coup/index.html

The weapons are Cold War-era B-61 "gravity" bombs.

"It's an open secret" the bombs are at Incirlik, Joshua Walker of the German Marshall Fund, who specializes on US-Turkey relations, told CNN.

US also has nukes in Germany, Italy and the Netherlands. :eek:


wow.. I thought the US only had nukes in US and on nuke subs.
so how easy is it to over run a nuke base abroad?

We used to have them all over. Scotland, Spain, Guam for the Submarine Nuclear Weapons.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
US nukes on US bases.
That was the fear with the coup in Turkey.
An attack on those bases and the full retaliation from the US military.
This could have went very bad very fast.
Guess one could say, we dodged that bullet, this time.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,407
136
Soon Trump will let Korea & Japan to have nukes, they are much responsible countries than Turkey.

Don't forget Saudi Arabia too

**I thought there was some unwritten agreement that nukes are kept out of Cuba and we'll keep nukes out of Turkey
 
Last edited:

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,874
48,648
136
Don't forget Saudi Arabia too

**I thought there was some unwritten agreement that nukes are kept out of Cuba and we'll keep nukes out of Turkey

The Russians were super worried about the US IRBMs in Turkey which would have given limited warning and reaction time. It is one of several things that precipitated the Cuban Missile Crisis and the subsequent deal to deactivate and remove them (the Jupiter missiles were in reality POSs anyway and obsolete) in exchange for removing their missiles from Cuba and a US promise not to invade.

Since gravity bombs won't be used in a first strike they are not similarly concerning.
 
Last edited:
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,407
136
The Russians were super worried about the US IRBMs in Turkey which would have given limited warning and reaction time. It is one of several things that precipitated the Cuban Missile Crisis and the subsequent deal to deactivate and remove them (the Jupiter missiles were in reality POSs anyway and obsolete) in exchange for removing their missiles from Cuba and a US promise not to invade.

Since gravity bombs won't be used in a first strike they are not similarly concerning.

That's it thank you
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
Yes, and in related "news", the advantage of the US's presence in Europe is really more on YOUR side and not so much on ours.

It's YOU who has the advantage of having closer hubs, military hospitals, air bases (Rammstein in Germany etc.)....for operations in the M.E...and of course the closeness to the East....while what we get in return is that we're priority targets in a potential conflict BECAUSE of *your* bases.

Think about this next time when some retard screams the US should withdraw from Europe, making it sound as if this presence is merely a benefit for us "for protection" at the cost of the US tax payer. It's a strategic benefit for NATO/the US, above everything, IMHO.