- Aug 23, 2004
- 1,324
- 0
- 0
http://story.news.yahoo.com/ne...s/pakistan_bin_laden_1
Kerry better pray that Osama isn't caught, or else he is finished.
Kerry better pray that Osama isn't caught, or else he is finished.
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
<tinfoil> He will be caught on November 1. </tinfoil>
Originally posted by: Klixxer
It has been close for two years.
Originally posted by: lordtyranus
Kerry better pray that Osama isn't caught, or else he is finished.
Originally posted by: conjur
Right on cue due to the criticisms leveled at the RNC for ignoring bin Laden.
Originally posted by: dudeguy
Originally posted by: Klixxer
It has been close for two years.
well lets put it like this, reuters, the leading news agency, didnt bother with this electioneering story, but AP hacked it out from a television transcript. hmmm. who is the fool?
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: conjur
Right on cue due to the criticisms leveled at the RNC for ignoring bin Laden.
They are hardly "ignoring" bin Laden, there has been active military operations to find and capture him since 2001. They just havent been talking about said operations.
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Yeah, Bush's Saudi buddies will love that one -I'll believe it when I see it
They have been saying this for years now.
They only thing being captured around Afganistan is poppys for profit.
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: conjur
Right on cue due to the criticisms leveled at the RNC for ignoring bin Laden.
They are hardly "ignoring" bin Laden, there has been active military operations to find and capture him since 2001. They just havent been talking about said operations.
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Yeah, Bush's Saudi buddies will love that one -I'll believe it when I see it
They have been saying this for years now.
They only thing being captured around Afganistan is poppys for profit.
Bin Laden is NOT in Afghanistn, he is in the rural and mountainous areas of Pakistan that are by and large ungoverned areas of Pakistan run by warlords sympathetic to the fanatical islamic jihadist cause.
Originally posted by: tallest1
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: conjur
Right on cue due to the criticisms leveled at the RNC for ignoring bin Laden.
They are hardly "ignoring" bin Laden, there has been active military operations to find and capture him since 2001. They just havent been talking about said operations.
Uh huh. Care to explain why the US would NOT want to report any form of progress in the War on Terror, especially in a place where it matters most?
Originally posted by: tallest1
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Yeah, Bush's Saudi buddies will love that one -I'll believe it when I see it
They have been saying this for years now.
They only thing being captured around Afganistan is poppys for profit.
Bin Laden is NOT in Afghanistn, he is in the rural and mountainous areas of Pakistan that are by and large ungoverned areas of Pakistan run by warlords sympathetic to the fanatical islamic jihadist cause.
Just because Bin Laden left Afganistan doesn't mean everything is peachy over there. Just look, we nabbed Sadaam months ago and Iraq ain't playing any nicer. Anyways, if I remember correctly Pakistan was declared an ally to us so nice try at putting blame elsewhere
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: tallest1
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: conjur
Right on cue due to the criticisms leveled at the RNC for ignoring bin Laden.
They are hardly "ignoring" bin Laden, there has been active military operations to find and capture him since 2001. They just havent been talking about said operations.
Uh huh. Care to explain why the US would NOT want to report any form of progress in the War on Terror, especially in a place where it matters most?
Did I say anything about progress? No. I said there have been ONGOING military operations since 2001. What progress they have made always does make it to the airwaves. But the US has its hands tied because it cant go in Pakistan go to war with the warlords in Pakistan to extract bin Laden. Pakistan has made many arrests in the past year, they just dont have the willingness to take on the warlords in their ungoverned areas with full force.
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Yeah, Bush's Saudi buddies will love that one -I'll believe it when I see it
They have been saying this for years now.
They only thing being captured around Afganistan is poppys for profit.
Bin Laden is NOT in Afghanistn, he is in the rural and mountainous areas of Pakistan that are by and large ungoverned areas of Pakistan run by warlords sympathetic to the fanatical islamic jihadist cause.
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: tallest1
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: steeplerot
Yeah, Bush's Saudi buddies will love that one -I'll believe it when I see it
They have been saying this for years now.
They only thing being captured around Afganistan is poppys for profit.
Bin Laden is NOT in Afghanistn, he is in the rural and mountainous areas of Pakistan that are by and large ungoverned areas of Pakistan run by warlords sympathetic to the fanatical islamic jihadist cause.
Just because Bin Laden left Afganistan doesn't mean everything is peachy over there. Just look, we nabbed Sadaam months ago and Iraq ain't playing any nicer. Anyways, if I remember correctly Pakistan was declared an ally to us so nice try at putting blame elsewhere
WTF? I didnt say anything like that. Im not laying the blame elsewhere, they are an ALLY of the US and they have arrested hundreds of terrorists and other al qaeda suspects. They will however NOT LET the US use military force in their country against warlords in their ungoverned sections. If the US had the authorization of Pakistan to go into ungoverned regions, the US would likely find a whole hell of a lot of wanted people. However in the process Pakistans govt would be over run, and we create even more problems.