Urban living healthier than suburban.

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Link

Apparently Green Acres is not the place to be -- at least not if you want to be healthy.

The Heart and Stroke Foundation Canada says the popular notion that living in the country or the suburbs is healthier than living in the big city is a delusion.

In fact, urban residents walk and bike more, drive less and, as a result, have healthier weights and healthier hearts.

"It is evident that the suburban dream has gone sour," Anthony Graham, a Toronto cardiologist and spokesman for the Heart and Stroke Foundation, said yesterday at the release of the group's annual report card on heart health.

"Our car-dependent habits are killing us. We have to start focusing on healthy lifestyle habits to replace our 'drive-through' mentality," he said.

Dr. Robert Ross, a professor in the school of physical and health education at Queen's University in Kingston, Ont., said that physical activity has been engineered out of our lives, and that problem is particularly acute in non-urban areas, where it is virtually impossible to even walk to a store.

"Non-urban residents are victims of poor planning," he said, blaming the current obesity epidemic in large part on the way suburbs are designed.

In its report card, the foundation shows that smaller centres are far less likely to have sidewalks, bike paths, and public transit.

It recommends that 7 per cent of all infrastructure spending be dedicated to sidewalks, paths and the like, and that municipalities make "active living" a priority when they do planning.

Dr. Ross said that while technological advances are not bad in and of themselves, people need to realize they must find alternative ways to incorporate physical activity into their lives or risk gaining weight and having a host of health problems. Chief among those problems is cardiovascular disease.

"Our body is not meant to sit in a car or in front of a computer all day. We need to incorporate activity into a normal day," he said.

Dr. Larry Frank, a professor in the school of community and regional planning at the University of British Columbia, said the way communities are structured has a profound effect on people's health.

His research clearly shows, for example, that the more time a person drives, the more likely he or she is to be overweight. Similarly, the more a person walks, the less likely the individual is to carry around extra weight.

And the research demonstrates that urbanites are far more active than suburbanites. As a result, people living in urban communities lined with shops and businesses, like Montreal's Plateau district and Vancouver's Kitsilano area, weigh an average of 10 pounds less than those living in residential-only subdivisions like the Calgary suburb of Sundance or Toronto's Meadowvale.

Urban dwellers are also about 35-per-cent less likely to be obese than the suburbanites.

"In non-urban areas, the propensity to be active is disturbingly low," Dr. Frank said. "The suburban dream is clearly not delivering on its promise of a better life."

About half of all adults and one-third of children in Canada are either overweight or obese.

Being obese -- defined as having more than 30-per-cent body weight as fat -- shaves about 10 years off a person's life expectancy. The number of deaths attributable directly to being overweight has almost doubled over the past 15 years, to 4,321 in 2000 from 2,514 in 1985.

Treating medical conditions that flow from being overweight -- including cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer -- also costs the health system at least $2-billion annually in direct medical costs. That number is expected to rise sharply because the massive weight gain of Canadians has occurred only in the past decade.

Yeah, who would have guessed that switching between car, computer and couch all day long could be bad for you? :roll:
 

p0ntif

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,130
0
76
I'm curious what the difference in the incedence of lung-related illnesses and cancers are between urban and suburban/country living.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,501
20,101
146
Originally posted by: calvinbiss
"It is evident that the suburban dream has gone sour,"

I stopped reading after this. What a stupid thing to say.

Of course it is. There is an agenda behind this movement. It is the environuts and their hate of "urban sprawl" that are driving this BS.

It is elitist nonsense.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: calvinbiss
"It is evident that the suburban dream has gone sour,"

I stopped reading after this. What a stupid thing to say.

Of course it is. There is an agenda behind this movement. It is the environuts and their hate of "urban sprawl" that are driving this BS.

It is elitist nonsense.

Are you joking?

Isn't the article about the benefits of physical exercise? The point was that urban dwellers are actually getting more physical exercise than people in the suburbs.

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,501
20,101
146
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: calvinbiss
"It is evident that the suburban dream has gone sour,"

I stopped reading after this. What a stupid thing to say.

Of course it is. There is an agenda behind this movement. It is the environuts and their hate of "urban sprawl" that are driving this BS.

It is elitist nonsense.

Are you joking?

Isn't the article about the benefits of physical exercise? The point was that urban dwellers are actually getting more physical exercise than people in the suburbs.

While ignoring all the other aspects. It is a biased report that focuses on one thing rather than the whole picture. The study set out to prove suburbs are bad, and did just that.

Exercise is not about where you live. It is about what you choose to do.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: calvinbiss
"It is evident that the suburban dream has gone sour,"

I stopped reading after this. What a stupid thing to say.

Of course it is. There is an agenda behind this movement. It is the environuts and their hate of "urban sprawl" that are driving this BS.

It is elitist nonsense.

Are you joking?

Isn't the article about the benefits of physical exercise? The point was that urban dwellers are actually getting more physical exercise than people in the suburbs.

While ignoring all the other aspects. It is a biased report that focuses on one thing rather than the whole picture. The study set out to prove suburbs are bad, and did just that.

Exercise is not about where you live. It is about what you choose to do.

The study doesn't prove that suburbs are bad. Rather, it identifies a pattern of behavior of people in the suburbs (i.e., to take their car everywhere, instead of walking). Now that this is known, people in the suburbs can be reminded of the value of working some exercise into their daily routine, etc. If behavior patterns like this aren't identified, how can you ever hope to have meaningful interventions to improve peoples' health?

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,501
20,101
146
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: calvinbiss
"It is evident that the suburban dream has gone sour,"

I stopped reading after this. What a stupid thing to say.

Of course it is. There is an agenda behind this movement. It is the environuts and their hate of "urban sprawl" that are driving this BS.

It is elitist nonsense.

Are you joking?

Isn't the article about the benefits of physical exercise? The point was that urban dwellers are actually getting more physical exercise than people in the suburbs.

While ignoring all the other aspects. It is a biased report that focuses on one thing rather than the whole picture. The study set out to prove suburbs are bad, and did just that.

Exercise is not about where you live. It is about what you choose to do.

The study doesn't prove that suburbs are bad. Rather, it identifies a pattern of behavior of people in the suburbs (i.e., to take their car everywhere, instead of walking). Now that this is known, people in the suburbs can be reminded of the value of working some exercise into their daily routine, etc. If behavior patterns like this aren't identified, how can you ever hope to have meaningful interventions to improve peoples' health?

Because the intentions are suspect. Maybe if you were aware of the highly elitist anti-suburb/anti-"urban sprawl" movement you would understand my skepticism.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
oh well, not a fvcking thing we can do about it. Unless we all want to raise families in cramped apartments, where we can walk to work we have to rely on distances, and those are only breached with cars or mass transit (and I've not seen a treadmill in a train).
I stopped reading after this. What a stupid thing to say.
I agree, and have to admit I only read a little ways beyond that.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,501
20,101
146
Originally posted by: Skoorb
oh well, not a fvcking thing we can do about it. Unless we all want to raise families in cramped apartments, where we can walk to work we have to rely on distances, and those are only breached with cars or mass transit (and I've not seen a treadmill in a train).
I stopped reading after this. What a stupid thing to say.
I agree, and have to admit I only read a little ways beyond that.

But you have to understand, that is exactly what the elitist anti-suburb folks want. They don't believe you should own a big lot in the burbs or country.

They are anti-freedom elitists to the core.
 

Jfrag Teh Foul

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2001
3,146
0
0
I live out of town. I drive whenever I go anywhere. I am 32. I weigh 135.

Wow... sounds like a health hazzard I am living in.

/morons
 

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: calvinbiss
"It is evident that the suburban dream has gone sour,"

I stopped reading after this. What a stupid thing to say.

Of course it is. There is an agenda behind this movement. It is the environuts and their hate of "urban sprawl" that are driving this BS.

It is elitist nonsense.

Yes, everyone knows that stopping urban sprawl is the Heart and Stroke Foundation's hidden agenda...:roll:

Care to share any other conspiracy theories?