I would hope so. I would go with something like this:
Hydro In -> ATS -> Rectifier bays -> batteries -> 48v equipment + inverters -> AC power distribution to equipment.
Anything that can run straight on 48v would skip the inverter.
The ATS would be hooked up to generators.
For a even more redundant setup, there would be TWO completely separate of these setups at two ends of the building. If something happens like a rectifier bay blows up, you shut power to the whole thing and still have another side running. Each rack would have a PDU fed from both grids and redundant PSUs would use both. For stuff that does not have redundant PSU it would be plugged into a separate UPS and staff could go manually plug it into the other grid or there could be an automated process to do this.
I work in a telco CO which is actually probably more important than a data center (if we go down ALL REGIONAL COMMUNICATION goes down) and we have a 48v setup as I describe. There's lot of redundancy. If rectifiers fail, there are more to carry the load. If AC fails, the batteries are good for hours, if days, there are also two generators. Each CO is setup like this though lot of them don't have an on site generator but we always say they should. Some have more capacity than others. Cell sites are similar, but are slightly lower priority during a crisis. CO's are highest priority as to keep transport and landline service going. This is why your phone still works if the power goes out.
At home I have a UPS with 2 100ah batteries good for about 4-5 hours. Eventually I want to setup a power inlet on the house and buy a generator. I don't have anything all that mission critical though but lot of my hardware is old and is at risk of damage if shut down so I prefer to do everything I can to keep it running.