Upgrading - which Intel CPU?

Kremlar

Golden Member
Oct 10, 1999
1,426
3
81
Not looking to overclock, not a big gamer. I am a heavy Windows user, multiple applications, CPU & disk intensive stuff.

I'm looking for an upgrade to my 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4. I was planning on going with a Pentium D, but now the Core 2 Duos seem to be a no brainer.

I'm looking at a price range that leads me to either a 3.4 Ghz Pentium D, or the E6400 Core 2 Duo.

I haven't read up on everything yet, but from what I have read it seems there's no reason to go with a Pentium D.

Am I wrong?

Thanks!
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Sure there's a reason not to get a Core 2 D, current prices, and lack of affordable Conroe-capable motherboards. But, if you've decided to upgrade right now, it wouldn't make much sense to spend the money on, say a 940, when you could be getting something that's 50% faster, and only costs ~25-40% more (depending on how long you wait, before buying).

Of course, that's assuming you won't have to pay $50 for an LGA 775 Celeron, so you can upgrade the BIOS on your C2D-capable motherboard to a BIOS that supports your new C2D processor.
 

Kremlar

Golden Member
Oct 10, 1999
1,426
3
81
OK, so maybe I should present my question differently.

Motherboard aside, what is my best Intel processor for $250 - $300?
 

stevty2889

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2003
7,036
8
81
Originally posted by: Nightmare225
The Core 2 Duo e6400.

Yep, not worth it to bother with a pentium-d, netburst is dead, and the e6400 will outperform the 950 at stock speeds by a decent amount.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Originally posted by: stevty2889
Originally posted by: Nightmare225
The Core 2 Duo e6400.

Yep, not worth it to bother with a pentium-d, netburst is dead, and the e6400 will outperform the 950 at stock speeds by a decent amount.
Yeah, I agree. Just spend a week or two doing your research on what RAM works with what motherboard, etc., before buying anything, and you'll be fine. But, if you decide to go Pentium D, get a cheap one, like an 805, and put it on a Conroe-capable board, then overclock it slightly while you wait to buy a Conroe/C2D. 3.0 Ghz x2 is very easy for an 805, for instance.
 

hardwareking

Senior member
May 19, 2006
618
0
0
Core 2 Duo consumes less power and generates less heat compared to any/all the netburst processors.
 

Pahonix

Junior Member
Apr 18, 2006
13
0
0
Originally posted by: hardwareking
Core 2 Duo consumes less power and generates less heat compared to any/all the netburst processors.

I was pretty sure this was the case too. Do you have any reference for this? Someone else questioned me on it and I'd like to provide a source. Particularly the "generates less heat" part. And also how the C2D's heat generation compares to current AMD chips...
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
26,922
15,891
136
AMD X2 is only slightly slower and hotter than Core 2 Duo. And a LOT less exspensive, and easy to get. Forget the Pentium D.

X2 or Core 2 Duo. Depending on price and availability, especially since not OC'ing, I say X2.
 

Kremlar

Golden Member
Oct 10, 1999
1,426
3
81
Yeah, I agree. Just spend a week or two doing your research on what RAM works with what motherboard, etc.,

Why the comment on memory compatibility? Any out of the ordinary quirks with the 965 motherboards? I'm looking to stick with an Intel brand motherboard, and big name memroy, so I assume I'll be OK...

Depending on price and availability, especially since not OC'ing, I say X2.

I was looking to stick with Intel.



Thanks guys!
 

Henny

Senior member
Nov 22, 2001
674
0
0
Originally posted by: Kremlar
Not looking to overclock, not a big gamer. I am a heavy Windows user, multiple applications, CPU & disk intensive stuff.

I'm looking for an upgrade to my 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4. I was planning on going with a Pentium D, but now the Core 2 Duos seem to be a no brainer.

I'm looking at a price range that leads me to either a 3.4 Ghz Pentium D, or the E6400 Core 2 Duo.

I haven't read up on everything yet, but from what I have read it seems there's no reason to go with a Pentium D.

Am I wrong?

Get an E6300 or E6400. They are easy to get and inexpensive. (ie E6300's can be purchased <$200 right now).

There are MB's less then $150 (ie DS3). There are even some <$100 like the ASROCK versions but I'd stick with Intel chipsets.

The only reason to get a Pentium D is cost savings. You'll save some but not that much.
Thanks!

 

gobucks

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,166
0
0
core 2 duo all the way! Both the e6300 and e6400 are better values for the money than any other chip currently available. If you're not OCing then there is no reason to get the gigabyte DS3 mobo though. don't get me wrong, it's a sick mobo, but its main strength is OCing, and if you're not gonna do that, then you should just grab a basic mobo that isn't as quirky as the DS3, like this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813121035
 

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,165
5,266
136
I really don't get why people say a lot less expensive. The is only like a $25-50 difference between comparable chips. If that small amount will break the bank, why the hell are you even upgrading your system???