• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Upgrading my Prius to a plug-in hybrid

pm

Elite Member Mobile Devices
Jan 25, 2000
7,419
22
81
I bought a new Prius about a month ago and I heard about a really good Colorado tax rebate for plug-in conversions, so I bought the kit sold here:

http://www.enginer.us/

And I'm getting ready to take my car apart and install it. :) (and, yes, warranty voiding issues are possible, but I can remove it if need be).

The kit basically installs a much larger battery which you can charge at home at night which continuously tops off the internal battery so then you can drive a lot farther using the internal battery than you would otherwise.

So the obvious questions that might come up are "how far does it go on electricity", and that depends a lot on driving habits it appears, but it seems like 12-30 miles depending on speed and electric-only mode use. Another would be "how much does this improve mileage?" and that seems to depend on who you talk to, how slowly you are willing to accelerate (the slower the better), and how fast you drive (you need to stay under 45mph to get best results), but a reasonable number seems to be about 25-50% better city mileage.

Another might be "can this kit really pay for itself?" and the answer is, unless you are in Colorado, probably not. In Colorado, you get an 85% rebate, and then there's a 10% federal rebate, and they stack, so it's basically 95% off of the price in tax rebates. Given the $3500 cost, it's basically $175 after rebates (if you install yourself). Users claim to get about 25-50% better city mileage with it - which on a Prius means about 60-75mpg city (up from about 50mpg city). It doesn't help much at all over 50mph, so highway mileage is effectively unchanged.

So, if you drive 12000 miles a year - in trips that are short and slow enough to use mostly electricity - then using optimistic numbers you'd save (12000/50 - 12000/70 = 240 - 171 = 69 gallons, @ $3/gallon = ~$210/year). Electricity where I live is about $0.07/kWh (yes, it's insanely cheap link if you don't believe). The cost of electricity here is about $0.30 to recharge, so theoretically it pays for itself in one year... in Colorado if you drive carefully, all city mileage, and you assume the most opimistic numbers. :)

In reality, I do drive pretty much 80% city and rarely drive over 50mph going to and from work but I don't drive anywhere near 12k per year. I've been driving about 7000 miles per year. But I've noticed that the Prius mileage sucks in the winter - which is something that I've never read anywhere except hypermiling blogs - because the motor runs full-bore until it heats up and so you can't drive in electric-only mode until the catalytic converter is hot enough and whenever it cools down, it turns the motor back on again. So... I'm thinking I'll be lucky to have the kit pay for itself in 5 years...

But, regardless of the economics of it, it's fun to tinker with the car, and it's an interesting project and it's unlikely to end up costing me more than I paid for it. I forsee the biggest problem is making sure my wife doesn't drive it off while it's charging.... There is the warranty issue... but there's not all that much to the kit (4 electrical connections total in the whole car) and I can remove it fairly quickly if I have to.

If there's any curiousity here, I'll post pictures and mileage numbers...
 
Last edited:

RU482

Lifer
Apr 9, 2000
12,689
3
81
sounds interesting. For $175AR, and the fact that its benefits match your driving style, it sounds like a worthwhile venture.

Does the prius have a block heater option? might help with that cold weather mileage.

.make sure to pull the orange plug...enjoy!
 

pm

Elite Member Mobile Devices
Jan 25, 2000
7,419
22
81
Thanks for the advice about the orange plug. Sounds like you know your Prius's. Apparently in addition to pulling it, you also need to remember to put it back on (it's boldface in the kit documentation). :)

And, yeah, there's a block heater option. And that is what they recommend to do. I hear that, ironically, the block heater is a lot harder to install than the Enginer plug-in kit. We'll see how frustrated I get at getting ~25mpg for the first 5 minutes for 5 months out of the year.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
Taxpayers having to pay for it is not "paying for itself"... :biggrin:
 

pm

Elite Member Mobile Devices
Jan 25, 2000
7,419
22
81
Taxpayers having to pay for it is not "paying for itself"... :biggrin:

That comment sounds more like P&N than The Garage...

I paid off my mortgage years ago and yet I fund everyone else's mortgage interest deduction. You don't think it's worth incentivizing cars that run primarily off of domestic energy supplies?
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
You don't think it's worth incentivizing cars that run primarily off of domestic energy supplies?

Nope. Not unless it makes economic sense, which as you already posted, it doesn't.

We should "incentivize" things that make economic sense, not things that don't.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
Nope. Not unless it makes economic sense, which as you already posted, it doesn't.

We should "incentivize" things that make economic sense, not things that don't.

News flash: You have no idea what the true costs of crude oil are.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
News flash: You have no idea what the true costs of crude oil are.

Does it make more sense to give a $7,500.00 rebate on a $41K Volt, or on a $17K Cruze?

Which incentive would save the country more oil?
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
Does it make more sense to give a $7,500.00 rebate on a $41K Volt, or on a $17K Cruze?

Which incentive would save the country more oil?


Lots of things don;t make sense in the short run. The prius was sold at a loss when it first came out but makes buckets of money for Toyota now. The Volt is sold for less than it should based on what is invested, again its a long term idea.

You can't base everything on the short term.
 
Last edited:

Vic Vega

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2010
4,535
4
0
The real question is did Toyota ever intend for the electric motor to be used to this degree? Are you shortening the life of the electric motor?
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
The real question is did Toyota ever intend for the electric motor to be used to this degree? Are you shortening the life of the electric motor?


Easy way to get a idea is toyota is in the works of havign a factory plug in prius. See of they change the motor or not. If the motor has major changes then you may be on to why they did not do it in the first place. If there is little to no change then I would think that is not the major issue.

But never thought of that as a problem if it was built well to begin with.
 

thedarkwolf

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 1999
9,032
125
106
The electric motor in the prius can only power the wheels by it's self up to a certain speed. Above that the gas engine has to kick it to keep the electric motor from over spinning. Can't remember what that speed was, probably 45mph going by the op's post. Had to do with the way toyota did the planetary setup in the trans. One of the things I learned in the many volt threads.
 

PlasmaBomb

Lifer
Nov 19, 2004
11,636
2
81
The electric motor in the prius can only power the wheels by it's self up to a certain speed. Above that the gas engine has to kick it to keep the electric motor from over spinning. Can't remember what that speed was, probably 45mph going by the op's post. Had to do with the way toyota did the planetary setup in the trans. One of the things I learned in the many volt threads.

The European Prius has an EV-only mode that is limited to 34 mph...
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
So how much do you have to drive before you break even compared to a civic or a golf tdi?
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
So how much do you have to drive before you break even compared to a civic or a golf tdi?


I'm guessing not much based on this...

$175 after rebates

:p

Better make good backup copies of your UPC and reciept. Thats ones rebate you want to keep track of.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
I'm guessing not much based on this...

$175 after rebates

:p

Better make good backup copies of your UPC and reciept. Thats ones rebate you want to keep track of.

I was thinking more along the lines of total cost of plug in prius vs those two cars.
 

pm

Elite Member Mobile Devices
Jan 25, 2000
7,419
22
81
The real question is did Toyota ever intend for the electric motor to be used to this degree? Are you shortening the life of the electric motor?

I honestly don't know. I am running the electric motor more. But it's like the Toyota internal battery is fully charged all the time... I am running it within spec... just more than it's supposed to be. One of the really nice things about electric motors - I've hand-made some fairly large electric motors - is that they are extremely low maintainence and are extremely reliable. I would think it should be fine simply because these kinds of electric motors last forever.

The European Prius has an EV-only mode that is limited to 34 mph...

Yeah, the US version does too. Mine can do this, you have to accelerate REALLY slowly to use it all the way up to 34mph. If you use gas to get up above 34mph, you can hold any speed up to ~45mph using electric only as well.

I was thinking more along the lines of total cost of plug in prius vs those two cars.

I did look closely at the Golf TDI (and the Ford Fusion Hybrid, and the Honda Civic Hybrid and the Passat TDI and the Honda Insight). We have two kids, and the Golf was too small - the price of the Golf TDI and Prius are very similar though ($22k for Golf TDI, $23k for Prius). The Civic Hybrid's seats don't fold down, and the Fusion Hybrid and Passat TDI were about 50% more than Prius. Versus, gas cars like the non-hybrid Civic, there's a ~$2100 Colorado state tax incentive for buying an alternative fuel (diesel counts) and this helps lower the price difference. (link). I also looked at the Civic GX - which is the natural gas version of the Civic. But the cost of the compressor - and the reliability of it - were concerning.

My favorite car to drive by far was the Passat TDI, followed closely by the Fusion. But they were both 50% more than the Prius. Once I dropped down to the price of the Prius, I didn't like any other car as much as the Prius. The whole video-game aspect of keeping it in electric-only mode in the Prius is pretty cool.

Better make good backup copies of your UPC and reciept. Thats ones rebate you want to keep track of.

Yeah, gotta copy that UPC. :) Actually, I have to take it down to a place to have it certified when I'm done.
 
Last edited:

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
Lots of things don;t make sense in the short run. The prius was sold at a loss when it first came out but makes buckets of money for Toyota now. The Volt is sold for less than it should based on what is invested, again its a long term idea.

You can't base everything on the short term.

The Prius was a private venture. The Volt involves the US Government.

Overall, I don't want any vehicles incentivized, but there seems to be a determined effort from congress to do so.

I was talking long term. Short term, you'd have to be rich or crazy to buy a Volt. ;)

For the economy, and for the environment, I think it would be much better to incentivize small cars that get decent economy that people can afford, like the Cruze/Focus/Fiesta, etc.

Lots more would be sold, I think. More fuel would be saved, I think.

We don't need to trade in any "clunkers" if we are going to do this. The clunkers would naturally and gradually disappear.

Maybe pick the previous year's top selling small cars, 1 from each mfg, and put a rebate on each.

Just incentivize cars that get good FE that regular folks can afford, and leave the high dollar niche vehicles to the marketplace winds.

Again, this is if you are already going to put incentives on some vehicles anyway. Otherwise, I'm against the rebates altogether.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
984
126
The Prius was a private venture. The Volt involves the US Government.

Overall, I don't want any vehicles incentivized, but there seems to be a determined effort from congress to do so.

I was talking long term. Short term, you'd have to be rich or crazy to buy a Volt. ;)

For the economy, and for the environment, I think it would be much better to incentivize small cars that get decent economy that people can afford, like the Cruze/Focus/Fiesta, etc.

Lots more would be sold, I think. More fuel would be saved, I think.

We don't need to trade in any "clunkers" if we are going to do this. The clunkers would naturally and gradually disappear.

Maybe pick the previous year's top selling small cars, 1 from each mfg, and put a rebate on each.

Just incentivize cars that get good FE that regular folks can afford, and leave the high dollar niche vehicles to the marketplace winds.

Again, this is if you are already going to put incentives on some vehicles anyway. Otherwise, I'm against the rebates altogether.

How do you feel about incentives for solar energy for home use (water heating/electricity)? The government has been subsidizing those for decades and I think it is worthwhile.

Personally, I'd love to go solar on my house.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,576
126
How do you feel about incentives for solar energy for home use (water heating/electricity)? The government has been subsidizing those for decades and I think it is worthwhile.

Personally, I'd love to go solar on my house.

In general, the marketplace should decide these things.

If the company selling the stuff wants to give you a discount to move the merchandise, that's their business.

The public shouldn't have to chip in to outfit your house or help you pay for a car, or help a company sell products. Especially with the mountain of debt we already have.

Solar seems to be a money loser, like wind energy seems to be.

If solar was economical, then it might make some sense to subsidize it to get it out there and going, but it doesn't seem to be.

If and when solar makes economic sense, it will enter the marketplace and do well. Forcing it in doesn't seem to work too well.

Solar was all the rage a long time ago, when I was a child. It didn't make sense then, so it died out.
 

desy

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2000
5,447
216
106
The oil and gas industry is subsidized billions of dollars every yr how is free enterprise served in that ? Many auto companies are given tax holidays to build their plants in certain states how is that representing the free market?
The marketplace is manipulated all the time, giving tax breaks on low volume special interest cars doesn't worry me