• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Upgrades are finally complete (for now)

KentState

Diamond Member
What started this summer as just wanting a air intake has turned into the addition of a pulley, thermostat, headers and a tune. Later this year, I will probably looks at a heat exchanger, cam, heads and a larger pulley.

Parts:
9.17" lower pulley
160 degree themostat
AirAid intake
Kooks headers/x-pipes w/cats
IMAG0076.jpg

IMAG0073.jpg


Here are the dynos for the first pull, after pulley/intake/tune and then the final after headers/tune.
CTSVdyno.jpg

CTSVdyno2012-01-03.jpg


IMG_4605.jpg

IMG_4593.jpg
 
Give us a YouTube vid with gratuitous revving!!


Does the car throw a cel because of the exhaust?

No. Kooks has been making them properly for while now so that it doesn't throw a CEL. I know that American Racing has updated their design to a more optimal location. I will try to get a video of it revving later in the week. Luckily, it isn't overkill when cruising, just a little louder, but really screams when you get on the gas. I was plugging my ears like a little girl when they did the dyno pulls.
 
No. Kooks has been making them properly for while now so that it doesn't throw a CEL. I know that American Racing has updated their design to a more optimal location. I will try to get a video of it revving later in the week. Luckily, it isn't overkill when cruising, just a little louder, but really screams when you get on the gas. I was plugging my ears like a little girl when they did the dyno pulls.


tease 😀
 
No. Kooks has been making them properly for while now so that it doesn't throw a CEL. I know that American Racing has updated their design to a more optimal location. I will try to get a video of it revving later in the week. Luckily, it isn't overkill when cruising, just a little louder, but really screams when you get on the gas. I was plugging my ears like a little girl when they did the dyno pulls.

No video? Someone ban him now. Right now. 😛
 
It always turns into a debate over the actual loss % too. Some want to use 20%, others say 10%, etc....

According to the baseline, the car is around the typical 15% loss. That's also pretty consistent across the various dynos I've seen. The average over at the Cadillac forum is around 470hp and tq. Going by that fuzzy math, the car should be around 650hp/670tq. The real test will be the track this spring.
 
According to the baseline, the car is around the typical 15% loss. That's also pretty consistent across the various dynos I've seen. The average over at the Cadillac forum is around 470hp and tq. Going by that fuzzy math, the car should be around 650hp/670tq. The real test will be the track this spring.

you really can't judge that unless the motor has been out of the car and on an engine stand.
 
Wow, ~460 ft-lbs at 2500 RPM, what are you usually turning in top gear freeway cruise, and is your mountain of torque named?
 
you really can't judge that unless the motor has been out of the car and on an engine stand.

Yeah and in the end pointless.

If the CTS-V was a bit lighter and tossable plus not in the 18's for MPG at the high end, I'd be in one of them or a M5.

In the end I love my M3 though...need to figure out which way I am going under the hood.
 
Yeah and in the end pointless.

If the CTS-V was a bit lighter and tossable plus not in the 18's for MPG at the high end, I'd be in one of them or a M5.

In the end I love my M3 though...need to figure out which way I am going under the hood.

I'd like to have either, but i'm too cheap. Hell, my camaro is really too rich for my blood. D:
 
Not familar with the CTS-V, eh?

i am famaliar with it. wat i meant to say to OP was that its putting down over 550 hp to wheels while looking stock. even the wheels are stock, it looks like a completely stock cts-v. i love that in a car. stock looking outside with power way over stock output.
 
According to the baseline, the car is around the typical 15% loss. That's also pretty consistent across the various dynos I've seen. The average over at the Cadillac forum is around 470hp and tq. Going by that fuzzy math, the car should be around 650hp/670tq. The real test will be the track this spring.

+1

from wat i learned on teh interwebz:

15% loss for RWD
25% loss for AWD
 
Back
Top