• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Upgrade to Promise ATA133 controller or use onboard IDE?

Here's my current setup:

Epox 8RDA3+
2600+ @ 2.5Ghz
Maxtor ATA133 120gb as primary master
Maxtor ATA133 160gb as primary slave
16x DVD-ROM as secondary master
8x DVD burner as secondary slave
Recently, the transfer of data from HD1 to HD2 has been lacking. I know it's been like this from the beginning, but it's an issue because I've started doing some video encoding. I'd like to maximize the drives' performance as much as possible.

I know that having both HDs on the same channel is the problem, since they have to share the bandwidth.

Option #1 - Rearrange drives on onboard IDE controllers
HD1 as PM
DVD burner as PS
HD2 as SM
DVD-ROM as SS

Option #1 - Get a Promise ATA133 TX2 controller and put each drive on a single channel

HD1 as master on Promise controller 1
HD2 as master on Promise conroller 2
DVD-ROM as master on primary onboard IDE
DVD burner as master on secondary onboard IDE

I can pick up the Promise controller for $20-25. Do you think it would be noticeable performance gain using the Promise controller vs. just simply rearranging the drives on the onboard controller?
 
I would start with option #1 and see how they do. I'd also try option #1 without any optical drives on the channel to see if that makes any difference.
 
Originally posted by: CalvinHobbes
I would start with option #1 and see how they do. I'd also try option #1 without any optical drives on the channel to see if that makes any difference.

Well, I've heard some people still claim having a HD on the same channel as an optical drive means the HD will run at the slower speed of the optical. I'm sure that's why my current setup is the way I have it now. But everything I've been able to find claims most boards made in the last 2-3 years all support Indepedent Device Timings. This just simply means each device, regardless if it's a HD or optical drive, can each run independently of each other.
 
When possible, I like to put all drives on separate channels. Instead of Promise, get a Silicon Image based card like the Syba (often $20. or less shipped) - the SI chipset is much more flexible than the Promise (runs pretty much any way you need with any drives you need from ATAPI to RAID). Most SI-based kits come with only one cable so you may need to order one along with.

.bh.
 
I would put HD's on one controler and Opticals on another. how often to you read /write to both drives? only when moving stuff or if you have a page file there.
Or
boot drive primary master
cpticals on secondary
non boot on PCI controller.
 
Back
Top