Upgrade path

choliscott

Senior member
Mar 11, 2010
206
0
76
Hi everyone,

Currently have a 6100 unclocked. The cpu is used for gaming & noticed that it doesn't do too well at stock speed. So I'm trying to figure out if I should just get a new board & OC the 6100, or if I should invest in either a 6300 or 8320.

If I was to invest in a 6300 or 8320, would I need to OC either one of those to make it play games well or does these two cpu's play games well at stock speed?

I know overall the best upgrade would be the intel I5 Sandy or Ivy bridge, but looks like I could save $50-$70 going the AMD route.
 
Last edited:

Puppies04

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2011
5,909
17
76
Hi everyone,

Currently have a 6100 unclocked. The cpu is used for gaming & noticed that it doesn't do too well at stock speed. So I'm trying to figure out if I should just get a new board & OC the 6100, or if I should invest in either a 6300 or 8320.

If I was to invest in a 6300 or 8320, would I need to OC either one of those to make it play games well or does these two cpu's play games well at stock speed?

I know overall the best upgrade would be the intel I5 Sandy or Ivy bridge, but looks like I could save $50-$70 going the AMD route.

If it is only $50-$70 saving then go down the intel route, if you get a "k" chip that can be overclocked it is going to beat any AMD chip at stock for gaming and be able to overclock by a greater % increasing it's lead further. You could easily save the difference in price over 2-3 years in electricity costs alone as the AMD chips can pull more than double the wattage of intels offerings once overclocked.
 

Torn Mind

Lifer
Nov 25, 2012
12,086
2,774
136
Overclocking those chips are necessary for them to get even close to an i5-3470, and they still trail the Intels even with overclocks.