SAAA
Senior member
- May 14, 2014
- 541
- 126
- 116
5GHz Sandy... hmm not bad.
If you are interested in upgrading give a look at the last pages of the Skylake thread and notice what that cpu is doing in some games: at similar clocks it pushes more frames than 6-8 cores older gen processors!
6700K might be a good upgrade then but personally I'd never get less core than I already have (unless the difference is staggering) so holding till Skylake-X 8/10 cores should be a great idea. Overclockability should also go up against Broadwell-E: even more refined process/architecture and no more FIVR.
Kabylake likely is just a minor step so the quad cores will only have clocks as advantage, Skylake had the gains in games this generation, Haswell in compute. Likely Skylake-X has different cores than 6700K, derived from the server variant, and supports newer AVX and possibly larger caches, so it will be even better at compute.
If you are interested in upgrading give a look at the last pages of the Skylake thread and notice what that cpu is doing in some games: at similar clocks it pushes more frames than 6-8 cores older gen processors!
6700K might be a good upgrade then but personally I'd never get less core than I already have (unless the difference is staggering) so holding till Skylake-X 8/10 cores should be a great idea. Overclockability should also go up against Broadwell-E: even more refined process/architecture and no more FIVR.
Kabylake likely is just a minor step so the quad cores will only have clocks as advantage, Skylake had the gains in games this generation, Haswell in compute. Likely Skylake-X has different cores than 6700K, derived from the server variant, and supports newer AVX and possibly larger caches, so it will be even better at compute.