updated distributed.net win32 Beta Client

SSP

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
17,727
0
0
Cool! Thanks Moose. :)

I hope you guys optimized the Athlon cores again.. hehe ;)

So anyone tried it yet? :D
 

stappel

Junior Member
Oct 11, 2000
8
0
0
OGR core still slow on a Classic Athlon 700@750.
Getting 5000 nodes/sec on the new client (C version) was getting 6100 on
the 463 client.
 

RC

Golden Member
Jun 23, 2000
1,358
4
91
stappel - thanks for the update. Please be certain to email Cyrus with your results so that he can correct the problem.
 

SSP

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
17,727
0
0
Old Client

dnetc v2.8010-463-CTR-00071214 for Win32 (WindowsNT 5.0).

[Oct 26 04:18:10 UTC] Benchmark for RC5 core #6 (RG/HB ath)
0.00:00:16.20 [2,264,998.01 keys/sec]



New Client
dnetc v2.8011-464-GTR-00102500 for Win32 (WindowsNT 5.0).

[Oct 26 04:21:31 UTC] Benchmark for RC5 core #6 (RG/HB re-pair II)
0.00:00:17.65 [2,249,667.59 keys/sec]


I took the lowest score from the old client and the highest score on the new client (ran both benchmarks [long] 3 times).

This is on an Athlon 600@642 running Win 2K.

Hope this helps. :)

BTW, I went back to the older client (v2.8010-463-CTR-00071214).
 

vss1980

Platinum Member
Feb 29, 2000
2,944
0
76
Got it, tried it and it works fine connecting through my Win98se ICS (NAT) box also.

Benchmarked it: P3-600 (512k cache), 192MB 100MHz CAS-2, Intel BX (Gigabyte BX-2000), Win32 client

463 client:
Average (best of 3) - Percentage performance lost from 463 client
RC5 Average - 1,675,295.5 keys/sec
OGR Average - 3,994,161.25 nodes/sec

464b client:
RC5 Average - 1,674,176.55 keys/sec - -0.067%
OGR Average - 3,829,154.90 nodes/sec - -4.309%

464c client:
RC5 Average - 1,674,422.71 keys/sec - -0.052% (not as bad)
OGR Average - 3,842,158.16 nodes/sec - -3.956% (not as bad)

This of course assumes that the benchmarks are telling the full story - which is unlikely. But the benchmarks still indicate a slower client - looks like if you dont have a proxy problem, stick with 463 :)
 

BGod

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,375
39
91
I changed all 5 machines over lastnight and let it run. The results after almost 24 hours are: All machines are doing the same output as they were on v2.8010-463.

The upside to this client is that it has NO problems finding the pproxy on my ICS machine. I actually killed the Task Scheduler on 3 of my machines that I had to run to force them to flush blocks to the pproxy (dnetc.exe -update).

Now I get this: [Oct 26 22:33:24 UTC] Detected IP-link on 'eth0/lan0'...

Moose, Thank You!
 

Viztech

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,807
0
0
Heyhey, that sounds like great news BGod! I assume that was with the 464c version.

As for the benchmark vs actual speed, I let the 464 a or b version crunch a full OGR stub on my K6 233. The speed overall was .993 Mnodes/sec, which is down from 1.5 Mnodes/sec with the good old 463b client.
The 464 benchmarked at .973 Mnodes/sec, so the actual is quite close.

I'll drop Cyp an email and switch back to 463b for OGR cracking.

viz