updated distributed.net client BETA v2.8011.464e

Engine

Senior member
Oct 11, 1999
519
0
0
They seem to do it in bunches. There'll be a client put out there for pre-release, and then more pre-release clients as bugs are fixed, then finally a release version of the client.

Moose: What's up with the speed of the new versions? On my celermine @ 850 the 463 client actually had a percieved speed jump from OGR-24 to OGR-25 (5.64 Mnodes/sec on OGR-24, 6.2 Mnodes/sec on OGR-25). I did about four or five WU's with the 464d client, and the speed was back down to 5.65 or 5.7 Mnodes/sec. Is this new version actually a little slower, or was the 463 client reporting the speeds wrong?
 

Moose

Member
Apr 8, 2000
180
0
0
We are currently in a Beta period. We are trying to squash as many bugs as possible. The more people that send feedback to Cyrus the better. Normally we do not update clients this frequently, these are just beta clients that we are making available to solve many of the problems we have had in the past with the client.

Making sure dial-up lurk works right, making sure the client doesn't hang win9x when the machine is shutdown or rebooted, etc.

Team AnandTech has helped us in the past find lots of bugs. You guys use it in so many different ways that we just can't reproduce them all.

Thanks to everyone who has helped us find bugs.

As far as the cores go

a) yes, it (OGR) is slower because the single core in there is optimized for P5. (final client will have 2 cores)
b) yes, it appears slower because the benchmark suite has changed
c) yes, it appears slower because .464a-d used different timing for benchmark

If you are running a beta client in hopes of just getting a faster key rate please understand that the idea behind these betas is not showing an increase in speed, its to find bugs. Please do not report that the client is slower to Cyrus anymore. He knows about he will be changing things as the beta goes along.

If you really want to help, please look at the list of changes and see if you can verify that the changes/fixes work/don't work. Or if you know you had problems with X feature before see if you are still having that problem and report it to Cyrus.

Moose
 

Engine

Senior member
Oct 11, 1999
519
0
0
Heh.. that's exactly why I posted the question here. I didn't want to bug Cyrus with something I was sure he already knew about. I was mainly just curious about the percieved speed decrease.

BTW, the new nodecount display for OGR is kickass... a lot better than the percent complete-o-meter :) Keep up the good work, guys.
 

DanC

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2000
5,553
0
0
Tested the beta - My Athlon 700 runs about 3Kkeys/sec slower. I'm sticking with the other one for now.
 

JHutch

Golden Member
Oct 11, 1999
1,040
0
0
3Kkeys/sec, DanC? Windows resizing its swap file in the background could account for more of a difference than that... :)

JHutch