brycejones
Lifer
- Oct 18, 2005
- 27,493
- 26,514
- 136
Agreed. OP, stop using sources that paint a completely one-sided picture of things.
That said, this was completely screwed up. It shouldn't be OK for cops to shoot first and ask questions later. Unless there was clear evidence of the guy being an imminent threat to kill or harm someone and there was no other way of subduing him, shooting should not have been an option.
The result in the case (a monetary verdict) isn't really justice in any way, it just gives money to the family, but the perpetrators of the crime get away with no repercussions.
Agreed, and I appreciate that you took a rational view of the case opposed to the OP who sounds like a drama queen anymore.
