Originally posted by: sandorski
This is quite evident by from the Campaign ads. Bush ad:"Kerry this, Kerry that, Kerry bad, mmmmkay? I Dubya, I approve message"; Kerry ad "I this, I that, I good, I Kerry I approve message"
I recall 1 Bush ad where Kerry isn't mentioned, but all it says is that, "I know where I want to lead this country" and that's about it.
The Election seems to be all about Kerry, not Bush's past 4 years, not about Bush's record. It is all mysteriously absent.
I feel for you guys, you have to put up with 4-5 more months of this. Us Canadians will have it all finished and done in 1 month. Approx 5-6 weeks of total Campaigning to put up with(there has been a couple months of light campaigning prior to the Election call, but it was mostly positive "we are good" kinda stuff).
Here's a :beer: to hold you over.
Buahahahaha - And you have the nerve to whine...
I see, so presenting kerry's voting record is "negative"? Well, I suppose it is in a way - I sure would consider it a negative if I were a democrat.
You also don't seem to comprehend the Bush-bashing argument. Wallow away though...you seem to enjoy your current state.
CkG
Wallow away though...you seem to enjoy your current state."
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Buahahahaha - And you have the nerve to whine...
I see, so presenting kerry's voting record is "negative"? Well, I suppose it is in a way - I sure would consider it a negative if I were a democrat.
You also don't seem to comprehend the Bush-bashing argument. Wallow away though...you seem to enjoy your current state.
CkG
"I see, so presenting kerry's voting record is "negative"?"
I never said that. Read closer.
"if i were a democrat."
Are you not a supporter of democracy? How far-right are you?
"You also don't seem to comprehend the Bush-bashing argument."
Is there an argument capable of explanation? I'll just assume it's a double-standard otherwise.
"Buahahahaha - And you have the nerve to whine...
Please try to be more mature in your posts and avoid these emotional outbursts. They do nothing for any arguments you may or may not have.
Now you seem to want to yap about "maturity". It's a nice try info, but it doesn't play. Seems you can't take a piece of your own medicine.You are quite the piece of work there info. First you call names and then whine when it is done back to you. Then you whine again when that fact is pointed out to you.
Now what exactly did you mean by "When it's Kerry's negatives" then if the subject I was talking about was kerry's votes? If you don't mean his voting record(which is what I was talking about) then what "negatives" are you talking about in your reply to my post about the voting record.(sorry if that was too long for and drawn out for you to understand but you seem to have troubles with context)
Yep - you'll just assume like you always seem to do. The argument about Bush bashing goes back before you "blessed" us with your squawking. It still exists today though - just take a look at the Iraq education thread, take a look at any thread that isn't specifically about Bush or kerry - look at what most of them turn into. But yeah, if you want to talk hypocrites - we can take a look at your posts in this thread. Pfffttt - whining about name-calling when you where the one who did it and I replied with a similar one
CkG
Originally posted by: Infohawk
You are quite the piece of work there info. First you call names and then whine when it is done back to you. Then you whine again when that fact is pointed out to you.
Now what exactly did you mean by "When it's Kerry's negatives" then if the subject I was talking about was kerry's votes? If you don't mean his voting record(which is what I was talking about) then what "negatives" are you talking about in your reply to my post about the voting record.(sorry if that was too long for and drawn out for you to understand but you seem to have troubles with context)
Yep - you'll just assume like you always seem to do. The argument about Bush bashing goes back before you "blessed" us with your squawking. It still exists today though - just take a look at the Iraq education thread, take a look at any thread that isn't specifically about Bush or kerry - look at what most of them turn into. But yeah, if you want to talk hypocrites - we can take a look at your posts in this thread. Pfffttt - whining about name-calling when you where the one who did it and I replied with a similar one
CkG
When did I call you or other posters names? I haven't. Hence I haven't been hypocritical in that regard.
Yep you're right, you aren't a hypocrite. :roll:
Ah, the "percieved" negatives. "Making the obvious clear is part of good writing."
) and let them decide. He can say he is for or against that but how do people know without looking at his record? Shouldn't more than a decade in the Senate provide you with some solid things to run on? Guess not...Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Again, pay attention and maybe you'll see what people mean when they say things always seem to turn into a Bush bash.
Now back to the issue. kerry isn't talking about himself, he's not running on his voting record and yet people are trying to make an issue of Bush showing people kerry's record? If you look at kerry's site you'll see(repeatedly) that he was a Vietnam veteran and that he says he's going to do things better than Bush yet provides no substance to that assertion. Being "not-Bush" isn't going to win him the election. He needs to show people his record(not kerrey's
CkG
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Again, pay attention and maybe you'll see what people mean when they say things always seem to turn into a Bush bash.
Now back to the issue. kerry isn't talking about himself, he's not running on his voting record and yet people are trying to make an issue of Bush showing people kerry's record? If you look at kerry's site you'll see(repeatedly) that he was a Vietnam veteran and that he says he's going to do things better than Bush yet provides no substance to that assertion. Being "not-Bush" isn't going to win him the election. He needs to show people his record(not kerrey's
CkG
"Again, pay attention and maybe you'll see what people mean when they say things always seem to turn into a Bush bash."
I have been paying attention. From what I gather, "Bush bashing" is when a thread is predominately criticism of Bush or his policies. If you think it is something else, please explain what it is. Please share. (If you don't, I can only assume you either don't know or you agree with my definition).
"back to the issue"
You are returning to an issue you created and that is not really the main issue of the thread. There's nothing wrong with your issue but the sub-topic of my post was the double-standard when it comes to so-called bashing. You engaged in my sub-topic by responding to my post. So let's stick with it until it's resolved. If you want to continue your other issue after we could do that but I have never really engaged that issue.
That's OK though. No need to explain - it's pretty obvious.
Facebook
Twitter