Up in Smoke: Marijuana Toasts Memory..13 March 2006

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,967
140
106
Text




If you can't remember the headline of this article or are already struggling to recall some of the words at the beginning of the story, try hard to recall how much pot you smoked in your youth.

A new study finds those who've used a lot of marijuana have worse memories and don't think as quickly.

It's not the first study to suggest pot hurts memory, but the findings are stark.

In one memory test, long-time uses remembered seven of 15 words, on average. Non-users remembered 12 of 15. On a decision-making test, those who had rarely smoked pot had impaired performance 8 percent of time, while long-term tokers had 70 percent impairment.

The results are detailed in the March 14 issue of the journal Neurology.

The study involved 64 people age 17 to 49 selected from a larger study group. They were split into three groups: those who had smoked four or more joints per week for more than 10 years; those who'd been smoking for five to 10 years; and those who had smoked at least once but not more than 20 times and not at all in the past two years.

The middle group consistently scored in between the other two.

"We found that the longer people used marijuana, the more deterioration they had in these cognitive abilities, especially in the ability to learn and remember new information," said Lambros Messinis of the Department of Neurology at the University Hospital of Patras in Patras, Greece.
 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
No kidding - my ex can't remember sh|t and she smoked alot of dope as a teen.
(waiting for the ATOT drug apologists)
 

Praxis1452

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2006
2,197
0
0
is it just me or haven't many studies shown that marijuana damage is temporary? and that if you stop smoking it reverts back slowly over time?
 
S

SlitheryDee

Originally posted by: Praxis1452
is it just me or haven't many studies shown that marijuana damage is temporary? and that if you stop smoking it reverts back slowly over time?


This was my understanding as well. Here's the abstract from the actual journal that the article refers to.

Text

Notice that the test only required that the subjects be abstinent for 24 hours before being tested. IMO this is not enough time for the residual effects of chronic use to dissipate. After all it's well known that THC remains in the body for up to 90 days after use. Maybe the tests results were as they were because some of the subjects were still a tiny bit "high" instead of being indicative of any sort of permanent impairment.

It's these kinds of slanted "studies" that fuel so much misinformation. At best the test is inconclusive and certainly can't be taken as evidence of what the OP is suggesting.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
32,890
12,183
136
Originally posted by: Armitage
No kidding - my ex can't remember sh|t and she smoked alot of dope as a teen.
(waiting for the ATOT drug apologists)

i have bad short term memory and i've never touched drugs period :(
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,967
140
106
Originally posted by: SlitheryDee
Originally posted by: Praxis1452
is it just me or haven't many studies shown that marijuana damage is temporary? and that if you stop smoking it reverts back slowly over time?


This was my understanding as well. Here's the abstract from the actual journal that the article refers to.

Text

Notice that the test only required that the subjects be abstinent for 24 hours before being tested. IMO this is not enough time for the residual effects of chronic use to dissipate. After all it's well known that THC remains in the body for up to 90 days after use. Maybe the tests results were as they were because some of the subjects were still a tiny bit "high" instead of being indicative of any sort of permanent impairment.

It's these kinds of slanted "studies" that fuel so much misinformation. At best the test is inconclusive and certainly can't be taken as evidence of what the OP is suggesting.

..I doubt if they were intoxicated but most certainly impaired and thwarted in their ability to learn and comprehend..for many in their formative years.

 
S

SlitheryDee

Originally posted by: IGBT

..I doubt if they were intoxicated but most certainly impaired and thwarted in their ability to learn and comprehend..for many in their formative years.

Your reply is rather vague but I'm interpreting it as "you're right, the study is inconclusive, but pot is still bad for you". Aren't you going to defend your OP? Or was presenting valid evidence for your views only the secondary objective of this thread?

Back to the point. It seems apparent that any hopes of studying the permanent cognitive effects of a mind altering substance would be foiled if you performed the study while the mind altering substance is still present in the test subjects.

 

slayer202

Lifer
Nov 27, 2005
13,679
119
106
Originally posted by: Amplifier
Most potheads are stupid to begin with. What say you to that retort?

I'm sure the potheads they used weren't the brightest of the bunch even before they started to smoke...
 

Udel

Senior member
Sep 2, 2005
892
0
0
Originally posted by: SlitheryDee
Originally posted by: Praxis1452
is it just me or haven't many studies shown that marijuana damage is temporary? and that if you stop smoking it reverts back slowly over time?


This was my understanding as well. Here's the abstract from the actual journal that the article refers to.

Text

Notice that the test only required that the subjects be abstinent for 24 hours before being tested. IMO this is not enough time for the residual effects of chronic use to dissipate. After all it's well known that THC remains in the body for up to 90 days after use. Maybe the tests results were as they were because some of the subjects were still a tiny bit "high" instead of being indicative of any sort of permanent impairment.

It's these kinds of slanted "studies" that fuel so much misinformation. At best the test is inconclusive and certainly can't be taken as evidence of what the OP is suggesting.
:thumbsup: ... Still an A student with a job. Smoke quite a bit. :laugh: