What facts? You claim studies have proven something? Do I just take your word for it? Can you just say studies have proven something and that makes it true? I was just doing the same...I mean there have been studies.
So you deny the fact that condoms have a higher breakage rate when used for anal sex?
Do you also deny the fact that anal sex is the leading cause of transmission of HIV?
Or that an estimated 47% of HIV cases in the US are the result of male on male anal intercourse?
Or that 63% of heterosexual HIV cases were male to female transmission.
All this comes from the CDC...
Insane, lots of studies have shown that anal sex is more receptive to contracting the AIDs virus than Vaginal. I'll try to find one tommorrow when I have time.
Anal sex prevents pregnancy.
and if they want to single out groups, how about the college cheerleading team. just how many class football rings do they find up their oonies
and if they want to single out groups, how about the college cheerleading team. just how many class football rings do they find up their oonies
WTF does pregnancy have to do with the safety of the blood supply? Are you normally this stupid?
hmm, give blood, prevent pregnancy, give blood, prevent pregnancy. you decide which is more important. don't diss it til you find out you got an unwanted kid. an ass is an ass, it knows know gender. and im only stupid on sundays
I'm actually not disputing that...
Also, I'm not going to just take his word for studies. If he wants to post about studies proving something, post the studies....
Anyone can just make a post saying studies prove something witout offering anything to back it up.
I'm not denying anything. Personally, it doesn't make sense to me, and I wonder how a study to prove that would be done, but until I see some of these studies you keep mentioning, am I just supposed to take your word for it?
Again, I haven't denied anything. Stop trying to put words in my mouth. Show me some of these studies you keep mentioning.
I'm starting to see a pattern here. An estimated 47%? Again...do I just take your word for it? An estimated 79% of statistics are not accurate...trust me.
See above...
So far, it's just coming from you. Links?
CDC Stats on HIV
The estimated number of diagnoses of AIDS through 2002 in the United States is 886,575. Adult and adolescent AIDS cases total 877,275 with 718,002 cases in males and 159,271 cases in females. Through the same time period, 9,300 AIDS cases were estimated in children under age 13.
Exposure Group; Male; Female; Total
Male-to-male sexual contact; 420,790; -; 420,790
Injection Drug Use, 172,351; 67,917; 240,268
Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use, 59,719; -; 59,719
Heterosexual contact 50,793; 84,835; 135,628
Other*; 14,350; 6,519; 20,869
420,790 out of 877,275 is ~47%
84,835 out of 135,628 is ~63%
Heterosexual HIV Transmission
Male to Female(vaginal intercourse) transmission 9 in 10000
Female to Male(vaginal intercourse) transmission far lower than 9 in 10000
Anal sex transmission
Anal sex 1 in 100
'nuff said
The estimated number of diagnoses of AIDS through 2002 in the United States is 886,575. Adult and adolescent AIDS cases total 877,275 with 718,002 cases in males and 159,271 cases in females. Through the same time period, 9,300 AIDS cases were estimated in children under age 13.
Exposure Group; Male; Female; Total
Male-to-male sexual contact; 420,790; -; 420,790
Injection Drug Use, 172,351; 67,917; 240,268
Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use, 59,719; -; 59,719
Heterosexual contact 50,793; 84,835; 135,628
Other*; 14,350; 6,519; 20,869
420,790 out of 877,275 is ~47%
84,835 out of 135,628 is ~63%
Heterosexual HIV Transmission
Male to Female(vaginal intercourse) transmission 9 in 10000
Female to Male(vaginal intercourse) transmission far lower than 9 in 10000
Anal sex transmission
Anal sex 1 in 100
'nuff said
Thanks for the link. As I stated before, I'm not arguing that anal sex is not the most common transmission method. Let me repeat...
Now, what about this condoms breaking more during anal sex?
Now, what about this condoms breaking more during anal sex?
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Thanks for the link. As I stated before, I'm not arguing that anal sex is not the most common transmission method. Let me repeat...
Now, what about this condoms breaking more during anal sex?
Most hetero couples do not partake in anal sex.
Look at the numbers of infected homo vs hetero. Then compare the amount of homo vs hetero people their are.
Last I checked, anyone that participated in anal sex was barred from donating blood if they disclosed the information. Maybe not for ever, but for the forseeable future.
Condom Breakage
If you are concerned about the strength of your condom, a Consumer Reports study found that actual condom breakage is rare: 1 in 165 during vaginal sex and 1 in 105 during anal sex.
Actual failure rates are significantly higher due to user error. Also the real problem is the % of people who actually use protection.
If you are concerned about the strength of your condom, a Consumer Reports study found that actual condom breakage is rare: 1 in 165 during vaginal sex and 1 in 105 during anal sex.
Actual failure rates are significantly higher due to user error. Also the real problem is the % of people who actually use protection.
There are similar restrictions on people who visited or lived in Europe. But thats because of mad cow.
It depends on where we are talking about. I can dig up numbers about any country/area. In regards to the US, I am correct when I say most hetero couples do not partake in anal sex. Now Africa? There is a high rate of anal sex because of uneducated africans trying to avoid HIV/Aids. As for Europe, its higher than the US, some countries higher than others.
Sure, you can always "dig up numbers" somewhere, but I always wonder about the accuracy of some of these studies when they are dealing in something people might not be honest and open about. I mean, if you took a survery and you and your gf/wife enjoyed anal sex, you might not want to tell someone that.
All those CDC numbers are estimated too...
*shrug*
I don't think we disagree as much as we think....thanks for finally providing links. I'm sure you can understand that anyone can just claim studies show something, but until they can be seen and verified, it's really just taking that person's word. Not that I don't trust you...
:beer:
All those CDC numbers are estimated too...
*shrug*
I don't think we disagree as much as we think....thanks for finally providing links. I'm sure you can understand that anyone can just claim studies show something, but until they can be seen and verified, it's really just taking that person's word. Not that I don't trust you...
:beer:
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Sure, you can always "dig up numbers" somewhere, but I always wonder about the accuracy of some of these studies when they are dealing in something people might not be honest and open about. I mean, if you took a survery and you and your gf/wife enjoyed anal sex, you might not want to tell someone that.
All those CDC numbers are estimated too...
*shrug*
I don't think we disagree as much as we think....thanks for finally providing links. I'm sure you can understand that anyone can just claim studies show something, but until they can be seen and verified, it's really just taking that person's word. Not that I don't trust you...
:beer:
I go on what Ive read in the past, I usually also put IIRC or correct me if Im wrong. Its a pain in the ass tracking down studies online. Its much easier tracking down studies in bound volumes.
oh, we got outselves a tough guy here. It's amazing how the weight of the internet feels as light as the air you blow
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter