Unchecked, unchallenged parasites...

rhatsaruck

Senior member
Oct 20, 2005
263
0
0
"In a democracy, the policy of the leaders is the policy of the people. So don?t be shocked when our grandkids bury much of this generation as traitors to the nation, to the world and to humanity. Most likely, they will come to know that ?somehow? was nurtured by fear, insecurity and indifference, leaving the country vulnerable to unchecked, unchallenged parasites."

Text

Commentary from a man who has put it all on the line, lived to tell about it, and isn't pleased with the turn of events.

This guy is a patriot in the fullest sense of the word.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
14,094
11,828
136
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Where's the option for "both"?

We have a Democrat President that declared a phoney War???

We have a Democrat controlled Congress?

It's all Clinton's fault, remember???
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
From the article:

Somehow the most reasonable, trusted and respected country in the world has become one of the most irrational, belligerent, feared, and distrusted countries in the world.

And we served up the lives of some of our best and bravest for that honor, all thru the CURRENT chickenhawk administrations lies and deceit. Criminal I say.
 

BrownTown

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2005
5,314
1
0
Being a worthless piece of cr@p knows no bounds: political, racial, socioeconomic etc...

There are some great Republican leaders, there are some great Democratic leaders, unfortunately there are just as many (some would argue many more) that are worthless.
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
Hey, this is great - you don't see that many poll where the GOP is ahead anymore . . .
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
14,094
11,828
136
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Hey, this is great - you don't see that many poll where the GOP is ahead anymore . . .

They'll probably get up to about 30%. Just like always.
 

wiin

Senior member
Oct 28, 1999
937
0
76
Originally posted by: Pens1566
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Where's the option for "both"?

We have a Democrat President that declared a phoney War???

We have a Democrat controlled Congress?

It's all Clinton's fault, remember???

You are correct about that.

 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
32,499
33,590
146
Originally posted by: wiin
Originally posted by: Pens1566
It's all Clinton's fault, remember???

You are correct about that.
You know who disagrees with that? Condi Rice-
RICE: Thank you very much. And now I'm happy to take your questions.

KEAN: Thank you very much, Dr. Rice. I appreciate your statement, your attendance and your service.

I have a couple of questions. As we understand it, when you first came into office, you just been through a very difficult campaign. In that campaign, neither the president nor the opponent, to the best of my knowledge, ever mentioned al Qaeda. There had been almost no congressional action or hearings about al Qaeda, very little bit in the newspapers.

And yet, you walk in and Dick Clarke is talking about al Qaeda should be our number-one priority. Sandy Berger tells you you'll be spending more time on that than anything else.

What did you think, and what did you tell the president, as you get that kind of, I suppose, new information for you?

RICE: Well, in fact, Mr. Chairman, it was not new information. I think we all knew about the 1998 bombings. We knew that there was speculation that the 2000 Cole attack was al Qaeda. There had been, I think, documentaries about Osama bin Laden.

I, myself, had written for an introduction to a volume on bioterrorism done at Sanford that I thought that we wanted not to wake up one day and find that Osama bin Laden had succeeded on our soil.

It was on the radar screen of any person who studied or worked in the international security field.

But there is no doubt that I think the briefing by Dick Clarke, the earlier briefing during the transition by Director Tenet, and of course what we talked with about Sandy Berger, it gave you a heightened sense of the problem and a sense that this was something that the United States had to deal with.

I have to say that of course there were other priorities. And indeed, in the briefings with the Clinton administration, they emphasized other priorities: North Korea, the Middle East, the Balkans.

RICE: One doesn't have the luxury of dealing only with one issue if you are the United States of America. There are many urgent and important issues.

But we all had a strong sense that this was a very crucial issue. The question was, what do you then do about it?

And the decision that we made was to, first of all, have no drop- off in what the Clinton administration was doing, because clearly they had done a lot of work to deal with this very important priority.

And so we kept the counterterrorism team on board.
We knew that George Tenet was there. We had the comfort of knowing that Louis Freeh was there.
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Even the Republican party's biggest donors give 40% of their funding the the Democrats.
Most politicans in the US are paid off with corporate and special interests...no matter what the Liberals in here tell you.

The Conservative Party of Canada has implemented the Accountability Act; any party to campaign with this in the US is bound to win.
* more powers to independent officers of Parliament, including the auditor general and ethics commissioner;
* measures to ensure federal grants and contracts "provide value for taxpayers' money;
* "real protection" for whistleblowers;
* reform of access to information laws
* merit-based appointments to public office;
* a complete ban on corporate and union donations, and an annual cap of $1,000 on individuals' donations to federal political parties; and
* a mandatory five-year break before former ministers and other senior public officials can lobby government.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,166
8,766
136
i know it ain't gonna happen, but i'd surely like for that article to be an integral part of every historical treatise and textbook that deals with pres. bush, his family, his cabinet and all the other neocons that adoringly kissed his royal grommet.