I don't know what he would say but I'd say that given that at least one former law enforcement officer deems it unwise to carry while you're performing your neighborhood watch duties. And a person involved in what is at the very least an unfortunate tragedy that could have been avoided was doing just that. There might be a push for new laws about it.
below quote from this source
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...314_1_orlando-police-block-captains-zimmerman
the bolding is mine.
Does this mean that Mr. Zimmerman was legally bound by such regulations? I'm not saying that. I'm saying that he acted in a way that at least some people with law enforcement career experience say is unwise.
Given that I'd expect that regardless of the outcome of the investigation there might be some real push to question the castle laws and to
perhaps enact a law that prevents an armed person on Neighborhood watch from approaching someone who isn't clearly committing a crime.
Furthermore maybe at least one poster on this board might be opposed to that.
I didn't really think about it until I read this part of Zinfamous' post...
...but when you consider that spidey07 parroted "no duty to retreat' several times in several posts (at least) throughout this thread. I'm beginning to think that zinfamous is right.
I'm really disturbed by that.
I enjoy shooting myself but when seem to be more concerned about the possibility of a tightening of gun laws than you are with the fact that a tragedy that could have been easily avoided occurred I begin question your level of empathy.