Again they had no evidence that refuted his story/claim of self defense so the prosecutor turned it away.
You keep saying that, but that is incorrect. You can have evidence and it not be enough to get a conviction. Big difference.
Again they had no evidence that refuted his story/claim of self defense so the prosecutor turned it away.
Do you have any idea how overreaching that law would have to be?
Again, let's not make this "9/11" all over again.
So with every other potential piece of evidence that may be out there, they would have shared it but not this.
That defies logic
"mob" "popular opinion" "standing up for the constitution"
Just admit it. You don't like black people and this is how you dehumanize them and trivialize their very real concerns about injustice in this country.
Look at the police reports. If you need a link LMK.
They did arrest Zimmerman, they cuffed him, they detained him, they took him into custody. They interrogated him. They have his gun in evidence still.
I should think it rather obvious that a PD has procedures to track what they are doing, who spent what time on what, who was brought in there and why, on suspicion of what etc.
The info is, in part, tracked with codes indicating what type of possible offense was being investigated.
It's a management thing, a liability thing etc. If some guy shows up at the ER and claims the police beat the crap of him what are they going to say in the absence of such records? "Uh, we don't know. We don't keep records."
Fern
Do you have any idea how overreaching that law would have to be?
Again, let's not make this "9/11" all over again.
You keep saying that, but that is incorrect. You can have evidence and it not be enough to get a conviction. Big difference.
Just don't get hard...Well if they do riot, maybe you can go in and straighten them out. Grab a couple of the other guys from here to go with you. I'll go with you as well, I got your back :sneaky:
They're not supposed to be releasing jack shit and they shouldn't have. But with what's released it's a clear case of self defense against a vicious attack.
They're not supposed to be releasing jack shit and they shouldn't have. But with what's released it's a clear case of self defense against a vicious attack.
Or they could just state stand your ground only applys to residence and automobile.
They could put an in public exclusion, fact is there are numerous things they could do.
You're confusing two different things here. This has to do with what an officer on the scene put in a police report. It has nothing to do with Chris Serino who wasn't brought into the case until they had Z in custody. According to the news reports, he filed an affidavit on 2/26 stating that he did not believe Z's story.
Report: Lead investigator wanted to arrest Zimmerman for shooting unarmed teen Trayvon Martin
Just don't get hard...
Gee Wolfe, read the link.
Here's the title of the article:
http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...to-arrest-zimmerman-for-shooting-unarmed-teen
This is exactly on point.
And by "affidavit" is it not possible, even likely, that other report was referring to a police report? The police report signature portion carries some language like "I swear and affirm the above is true and correct". (I have a old CART, that the best I can make out.)
In any case, it's clear the prosecutor's office is saying the report is false.
Fern
Austin Brown the 13 year old Saw Someone matching the description of Zimmerman on the ground seconds before the shot.
he didnt make any mention of Martin on top or near him when the shot rang out. If that account is accurate Self defesne has real problems.
So anyone else curious what brought about the difference of opinion between the homocide investigator and the state attorney's office?
Seems weird. Or maybe it's more common but it's just never brought to most peoples' attention.
Austin Brown the 13 year old Saw Someone matching the description of Zimmerman on the ground seconds before the shot.
he didnt make any mention of Martin on top or near him when the shot rang out. If that account is accurate Self defesne has real problems.
Austin Brown the 13 year old Saw Someone matching the description of Zimmerman on the ground seconds before the shot.
he didnt make any mention of Martin on top or near him when the shot rang out. If that account is accurate Self defesne has real problems.
When all else fails throw out the race card.
So anyone else curious what brought about the difference of opinion between the homocide investigator and the state attorney's office?
Seems weird. Or maybe it's more common but it's just never brought to most peoples' attention.
Gee Wolfe, read the link.
Here's the title of the article:
http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...to-arrest-zimmerman-for-shooting-unarmed-teen
This is exactly on point.
And by "affidavit" is it not possible, even likely, that other report was referring to a police report? The police report signature portion carries some language like "I swear and affirm the above is true and correct". (I have a old CART, that the best I can make out.)
In any case, it's clear the prosecutor's office is saying the report is false.
Fern
Your timeline is mixed up.
Z is following him in his vehicle as TM is talking to GF. She tells him to run and he does so. This is consistent with GZ's story that he lost TM who he was following in his vehicle has he ran behind some houses.
GZ gets out of the car while talking with 911 dispatch. He may have started to initially follow TM on foot, but at one point the dispatcher tells him not to follow. It is not clear if he started or continued to follow on foot after or prior to the dispatcher advise. GZ claims at that point he was looking for the street sign and was heading back to his vehicle.
Eaxctly see if it corroborates he was on top of him.
Or if Austin browns account of seeing Zimmerman on the ground with no mention of martin is correct.
If that gunshot doesnt support Martin on top Zimmerman is done
