nobodyknows
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2008
- 5,474
- 0
- 0
It looks like yoru projecting your own bias on here just like the rest of the posters.
LOL, why do I get the feeling that everybody but you does that?
It looks like yoru projecting your own bias on here just like the rest of the posters.
LOL
And amazingly they think this investigation was not botched.
The whole story looks like bullshit anyway.
See here:
http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...to-arrest-zimmerman-for-shooting-unarmed-teen
So the reporter confused internal tracking data and spun it to say the guy wanted to arrest Zimmerman.
Fern
"it's office politics. "
Or he didnt feel the guy was qualified to be interrogating a suspect in a shooting? based on the questions he didnt ask.
So ready to dismiss it as office politics what it sounds like is he didnt think the the Narcotics officer asked the right questions.
This is further backed up by Witness accounts they were coerced.
It looks like yoru projecting your own bias on here just like the rest of the posters.
How so?
Chris Serino was suppose to head up the investigation of this. Instead the initial investigation was done by a narcotics investigator and the file got sent to him. He reads the investigation and says he thinks the guy should be charged and is then told that there isn't enough evidence to do so. It's pretty much basic CYA tactics. No fallout is going to occur if there isn't enough evidence, and if there is later found to be evidence to charge then convict GZ he looks the hero. Again, office politics as I've seen it many times.
But hey, this is again my opinion and we don't even have the full story about this either. Just the tidbits about it. But to me this smells of office drama more than anything else.
To use similar logic as some other forum posters HAD they found drugs or Alcohol in Martins system dont you think they wouldhave shared that by now.
Good find!
Apparently they've been too busy trademarking their dead son's name.
Yet Zimmerman has interviewed three (3) times without representation surely the homicide detective got his shot at questioning him.
The whole story looks like bullshit anyway.
See here:
http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...to-arrest-zimmerman-for-shooting-unarmed-teen
So the reporter confused internal tracking data and spun it to say the guy wanted to arrest Zimmerman.
Fern
The whole story looks like bullshit anyway.
See here:
http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...to-arrest-zimmerman-for-shooting-unarmed-teen
So the reporter confused internal tracking data and spun it to say the guy wanted to arrest Zimmerman.
Fern
Okay you can choose to believe or not. I have three aquaintances that work for the New Jersey state police. One is a detective, one a sargeant, and one a patrolman. Over the years I have had discussions with all 3 as it surrounds all kinds of things, car chases and shootings, all kinds of stuff. I can asure you if a lead investigator put up that guy should be charged with crime, he ain't doing it for office politics. And I would assume all police departments would function in a similar manner. You might get some nonsense maybe in some bs type crime, but not in a potential murder investigation.
I don't know these people, but I will give them benefit of the doubt.
I just read this
"The governor said on Thursday night that a state task force would review Florida's Stand Your Ground law and recommend changes "so that we might help avoid such tragedies in the future."
So it looks like stand your ground is getting reviewed after all.
Might be some clarifying, but if a guy is innocent why would anyone even in internal tracking data think a guy should be charged?

The whole story looks like bullshit anyway.
See here:
http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...to-arrest-zimmerman-for-shooting-unarmed-teen
So the reporter confused internal tracking data and spun it to say the guy wanted to arrest Zimmerman.
Fern
I just read this
"The governor said on Thursday night that a state task force would review Florida's Stand Your Ground law and recommend changes "so that we might help avoid such tragedies in the future."
So it looks like stand your ground is getting reviewed after all.
Playing politics to pander to popular opinion doesn't mean anything will change. It doesn't hurt anyone in that position to state they are going "review" something. If they do and it leads to better refinement of the law then great. I just wouldn't hold my breadth hoping for an entire repeal of it. I sincerely doubt that is going to happen.
You're confusing two different things here. This has to do with what an officer on the scene put in a police report. It has nothing to do with Chris Serino who wasn't brought into the case until they had Z in custody. According to the news reports, he filed an affidavit on 2/26 stating that he did not believe Z's story.
I dont think that needs to happen, I think it should be amended not to allow armed private citizens to follow and pursue people with no evidence of a crime commited.
"Serino filed an affidavit on Feb. 26, the night that Martin was shot and killed by Zimmerman, that stated he was unconvinced Zimmerman's version of events"
and he is not the only one.
You're confusing two different things here. This has to do with what an officer on the scene put in a police report. It has nothing to do with Chris Serino who wasn't brought into the case until they had Z in custody. According to the news reports, he filed an affidavit on 2/26 stating that he did not believe Z's story.
"mob" "popular opinion" "standing up for the constitution"
Just admit it. You don't like black people and this is how you dehumanize them and trivialize their very real concerns about injustice in this country.
So does that mean the blacks won't riot if Zimmerman is not charged??
Might be some clarifying, but if a guy is innocent why would anyone even in internal tracking data think a guy should be charged?
