Londo_Jowo
Lifer
I agree and was simply pointing out Spideys evidence was Zimmermans tesimony.
Spidey has also mentioned other witnesses who's testimony corroborates Zimmerman's testimony as well.
I agree and was simply pointing out Spideys evidence was Zimmermans tesimony.
Legally there are hurdles, no doubt.
But...it's just the right thing to do. That's all I have for you.
Maybe he should clarify he doesn't see Z going before the grand jury...they will review the evidence yes but doubtful he will be brought up on any charges
Spidey has also mentioned other witnesses who's testimony corroborates Zimmerman's testimony as well.
Have some decency, she lost her son and is grieving, why shouldn't she be able to cash in on it?Apparently, Trayvon's mother, Sybrina Fulton, want's to trademark his name and the phrases people are using (i.e. "I am Trayvon", etc.)
http://now.msn.com/now/0326-trayvon-...trademark.aspx
Just sit back and watch it all unfold....
The evidence of the crime is a dead kid.
HOly shit, I mean, really.
http://upressonline.com/2012/03/fau-student-threatens-to-kill-professor-and-classmates/
Guys, even if Zimmerman's story is true...dude still should get a trial. Too much is left to speculation, and if the grand jury does not do anything, I expect significant civil unrest. I mean, you guys heard about Jothana Carr, right? Her freakout was in large part triggered by the Trayvon Martin story.
In order to have a trial he has to be charged with a crime. They don't have enough evidence to establish probable cause so I don't see that happening.
I thought it was a forgone conclusion
http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/19/2703029/us-department-of-justice-fbi-and.html
A grand jury was to hear the case on April 10, but now that De la Rionda's team has taken over they may or may not use the grand jury.
True but not as it relates specifically to heading back to his car when attacked, noone other than Zimmerman is stating that.
An important detail that might have been overlooked is that when Trayvon took off running George was asked which direction he was headed and George said towards the rear exit. So it is possible that George felt he had a good idea of where he might be headed.
So George takes off after Trayvon to see if he can reacquire a visual on him and the police dispatch tells him that he doesn't need to do that. George stops and tells dispatch he ran away.
What is the more reasonable next step here? It is possible that he knows where he is headed. Does he continue on foot hoping to catch up with someone who just outran him? Or does he go back to his vehicle to drive to where he thinks Trayvon is headed in order to patrol the area and see if he can spot him again? He may be thinking that if he does, he can let the police that are minutes away (and will call him when they get there) know where Trayvon is.
Maybe he should clarify he doesn't see Z going before the grand jury...they will review the evidence yes but doubtful he will be brought up on any charges
Have some decency, she lost her son and is grieving, why shouldn't she be able to cash in on it?
I've posted this before but it's always ignored.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4683869...-not-want-speculate-martin-case/#.T3ISnpLO-So
If I found out my neighborhood watch captain didn't do anything about someone who appeared to be on drugs, possibly had a gun in waistband, looked like a thug with thug attire, hid his face when someone drove by, and was running behind houses... I would probably vote him out.
I think there are NO problems with zimmerman confronting trayvon.
What he says during the call to police dispatch seems to support that as the more likely scenario
Have some decency, she lost her son and is grieving, why shouldn't she be able to cash in on it?
And lets just ignore the fact that he was just out running an errand and was a LAWFUL cc license holder...and while we're at it your "guide book" is another pointless deflectionThat's not Neighborhood Watch, that's Vigilante Force. The Watch observe and report suspicious activity, do not carry firearms, do identify themselves by armband or other, do not confront unless an illegal act is in commission. Check out the guide book yourself.
Just another excuse for bad actions...I'm sure this has everything to do with seeking "justice" right?There are lots of reasons to TradeMark that have nothing to do with profiting.
Just another excuse for bad actions...
Sure...it's all about "justice" right? Or is it "protecting his reputation"?Just because you call it bad doesnt make it so, you have a right to your opinion.
And lets just ignore the fact that he was just out running an errand and was a LAWFUL cc license holder...and while we're at it your "guide book" is another pointless deflection
Sure, why not ignore something that is in no way illegal and had it been a positive outcome would have not even made a headline in his town....when these things turn out well they are massively ignoredLets also ignore had he waited for the cops who he knew were on the way vs get out of his car to go find him. He wouldnt be in his situation and Martin would be alive.
Sure...it's all about "justice" right? Or is it "protecting his reputation"?
