Phokus
Lifer
- Nov 20, 1999
- 22,994
- 779
- 126
Are you ignoring the EYE witness that saw martin over zimmerman beating him?
Are you ignoring all the other evidence that say zimmerman's account is correct? If there was some evidence it wasn't then they would have probable cause and arrest him. Police say they just don't have anything to refute his story (WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY PRESENT) and is backed up by physical evidence, eye witness tesimony, etc.
Why are so many simply refusing to ignore all of that facts?
Why are you ignoring the fact that the police lied about the 9/11 tapes and tampered with evidence (coercing witness testimony), didn't follow procedures (they even didn't do an initial criminal background check and just took zimmerman at his word that he had a clean record).
Because you get your rocks off that he got to execute a black kid.
And why on earth would zimmerman need an attorney when the police are in his back pocket as corrupt accomplices.
