• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Unable to interpret Delta Tracking for performance of monitors

xMax

Senior member
i dont know what the delta value is. is it a percentage of the difference in luminance between one value and the value bellow or above it, like a 127 and a 128, so that if the theoretical value is supposed to be 127, and you get 127.1, then that has a delta value of 10...i dont know. is that how it works. because they say that more than a deltaE value of 3 is noticable, but if thats only 3 percent betweet the 127 and the 128, then how could that be noticable. its too small a value. i dont understand.

why is there two values delta-E and delta-C. they say its a measure of difference between the theoretical and actual, but if one of these is the theoretical, then how come its not a perfectly straight line, since a theoretical should be a perfectly straight line on the x axis itself and therefore not even be visible.

then i thought. maybe its the difference between the red and the blue line. but if that is so, then what is the red and the blue.

here is a link to an example for anybody who needs to see it:
http://graphics.tomshardware.com/display/20040116/s-ips_panels-04.html

i need a basic and clear explanation because i need a monitor which has to be very smooth when it comes to gradations , and i dont want to buy an EIZO CG210 and spend 2700$ when a 1200$ monitor would do the job.

so to simplify the questions:
1- what does the y-axis represent.
2- what does the red line represent
3- what does the blue line represent
 
Back
Top