You sure want to argue a lot based on opinion.
My most sincere apology on this matter.
It's more like "I enter your yard and don't leave until I get what I want".
You and LL and Abbas treat the situation of building as if Israel executes a Palestinian for every brick laid, while in fact it's just a political ladder for the Palestinians to climb down from the tree of talks.
Thanks.
Saying 'it's not as bad as a worse crime' isn't much defense. It's illegitimate 'chips'.
You have any of your own facts to back up your position? or are you just being the village idiot on puropse?
Do you believe that if you just keep calling me names, it will come true?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desmond_Lorenz_de_Silva
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Hudson-Phillips
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/docs/memberscv/MaryShanthiDairiam.pdf
Now put up your evidence of their bias
Are you saying they are objective?
Let's let the Jedi handle this one k?
He really likes doing these, call me names and run away crap
Runs away?????? Hardly!
You playing all innocent and all asking questions and claiming that you wanted to learn and know.
As Samur stated earlier -- these are objective?
Bias against Israel is all we have been talking about this whole thread --
Earth to Earl, Earth to Earl!
Read and comprehend what has been posted earlier.
What don`t you understand about these people that quite a few of us do understand??
The UN`s entire stand concerning israel is evidence of bias....or do yuo not understand...again...
lolololol
If the UN had any meaningful power people would be more apt to care about what it says.
Would we live in a better world if a majority rule of the world's failing countries told us what to do? If you want your life to be managed by Angola and North Korea, be my guest.
I do believe the countries with the veto are Russia ,US, France, UK, and China.
I agree. I think giving countries veto power is absolutely absurd.Any power the UN has is nullified when several opposing bodies control the veto rights. A UN with teeth is one without veto rights. That was my intent.
I agree. I think giving countries veto power is absolutely absurd.
Ambassador Charles W. Yost cast the first U.S. veto in 1970, regarding a crisis in Rhodesia, and the U.S. cast a lone veto in 1972, to prevent a resolution relating to Israel. Since that time, it has become by far the most frequent user of the veto, mainly on resolutions criticizing Israel; since 2002 the Negroponte doctrine has been applied for the use of a veto on resolutions relating to the ongoing Israel-Palestinian conflict. This has been a constant cause of friction between the General Assembly and the Security Council, as seen with the 2003 Iraqi war which was not endorsed by the UN.
Well, Israel is no doubt a happy camper about the veto
So why does the UN refuse to criticize Hamas???hmmmm
U.N. may not have real power but is the voice of International conscience
