UK's foils terror plot

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GenHoth

Platinum Member
Jul 5, 2007
2,106
0
0
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Are you fucking daft? I asked you to make a proper argument against what i have said and you come back with more strawmen?

I SAID that they are not traditional armies, you can't argue against it by providing the same fucking argument...

The search is done by small teams, the regular troops are there to protect the areas they are driven from you fucking nutjob.

I've already explained this to you and you STILL don't get it? How fucking hard is it to read the posts you are replying to?

Chill pill + you = win.

But you are correct, a regular army is needed to secure a base for special ops.
 
Jun 26, 2007
11,925
2
0
Originally posted by: GenHoth
Originally posted by: JohnOfSheffield

Are you fucking daft? I asked you to make a proper argument against what i have said and you come back with more strawmen?

I SAID that they are not traditional armies, you can't argue against it by providing the same fucking argument...

The search is done by small teams, the regular troops are there to protect the areas they are driven from you fucking nutjob.

I've already explained this to you and you STILL don't get it? How fucking hard is it to read the posts you are replying to?

Chill pill + you = win.

But you are correct, a regular army is needed to secure a base for special ops.

You try explaining it over and over and over again.

Besides, this is how i am normally, you should see me when i'm angry. ;)