Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
This seems to be a minority opinion around here, that?s nothing new for me, but I have to agree with their notion and the reason behind what they are doing.
Making the students resent and hate education is not a surefire way to make sure they become educated. Practice makes perfect, but that should already be covered among the 6 hours they spend in school every day, and checked with testing. If the kid passes the testing, who the f? cares how many hours a day were taken away from them in order to achieve that result?
I?m thinking the homework is needed for students who struggle with education. In other words, those with lower IQ or disabilities. In which case why do you want to ruin it for everyone due to the folly of a minority?
Exactly 50% of people have a lower than average IQ.
Originally posted by: jai6638
Dude... The homework given in the British system is much more than that in the US.. The homework given in the US is a joke and so I'd be worried if the American teacher's union said so.. For the older students in the British system, there's a lot of homework so I'm glad they're gonna reduce the workload.
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Am I the only person here who hasn't the foggiest notion what the HELL Moonbeam is talking about?
Originally posted by: Train
My guess is they are probably hiding the fact that poor education systems are failing kids, and are now saying homework doesnt help kids learn. I say thats BS.
http://techdirt.com/articles/20080312/024459514.shtml
Teachers' Union Debating Ending Homework For Students
from the ah,-if-only-I-were-a-kid-again... dept
In the past few years, we've seen quite a few reports suggesting that homework doesn't help kids learn along with some other reports questioning traditional learning techniques. However, it's still a bit surprising for it reach the level where a teachers' union in the UK is already considering a proposal to ditch homework for most younger students and drastically scale back how much there is for older students (found via Digg). The reasoning is a bit different. The older reports we saw pointed out that homework wasn't particularly effective at helping kids learn. The reasoning for this new proposal is that homework makes kids "unhappy and anxious" and that leads to stressed out kids and potential disciplinary problems. It would be interesting to see any actual research supporting one side or the other here. I think it's great that teachers aren't just assuming that homework must be good, since that's how it's always been done, but that doesn't necessarily mean it should be done away with completely.
We need to stop babying these kids and worrying about thier mood and anxiety. Give them work, make them do it, and if they are sad about it, they will get over it. They need to be prepared for the real world.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Exactly 50% of people have a lower than average IQ.
Won't argue against that, but perhaps one shoe size does not fit all. Besides, we do not know at what percentile a large volume of homework becomes necessary for education. I agree with the notion that at some percentile it becomes necessary, but I would argue in favor of reducing it for kids who have higher grades as to not reap the negative effects on everyone.
Education needs to be tailored to the student?s learning ability, and to address those who fail to learn as easily as others. Blanket solutions will only hurt those at the top of the class.
I agree, that's why my daughter is homeschooled, but she still does homework. Homework is a part of demonstrating that the lesson has been learned adequately.
That said, I never did homework when I was a kid, and my grades showed it. I only managed a B average through high school because I could ace the tests in my sleep. That doesn't mean homework wasn't necessary, it showed people I'm lazy. Which I am, LOL. Instilling a work ethic is just as important to children as being book smart is.
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Exactly 50% of people have a lower than average IQ.
Won't argue against that, but perhaps one shoe size does not fit all. Besides, we do not know at what percentile a large volume of homework becomes necessary for education. I agree with the notion that at some percentile it becomes necessary, but I would argue in favor of reducing it for kids who have higher grades as to not reap the negative effects on everyone.
Education needs to be tailored to the student?s learning ability, and to address those who fail to learn as easily as others. Blanket solutions will only hurt those at the top of the class.
I agree, that's why my daughter is homeschooled, but she still does homework. Homework is a part of demonstrating that the lesson has been learned adequately.
That said, I never did homework when I was a kid, and my grades showed it. I only managed a B average through high school because I could ace the tests in my sleep. That doesn't mean homework wasn't necessary, it showed people I'm lazy. Which I am, LOL. Instilling a work ethic is just as important to children as being book smart is.
I hope that your daughter's math homeschooling isn't taught by you!
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Go fuck yourself dipshit. I used average in the layman's sense. How many people talk about medians on a daily basis, you fucking pedantic prick.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: jai6638
Dude... The homework given in the British system is much more than that in the US.. The homework given in the US is a joke and so I'd be worried if the American teacher's union said so.. For the older students in the British system, there's a lot of homework so I'm glad they're gonna reduce the workload.
Yeah, and look what kind of morons our schools are pumping out. Do they really want to match us?
Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Originally posted by: Train
My guess is they are probably hiding the fact that poor education systems are failing kids, and are now saying homework doesnt help kids learn. I say thats BS.
http://techdirt.com/articles/20080312/024459514.shtml
Teachers' Union Debating Ending Homework For Students
from the ah,-if-only-I-were-a-kid-again... dept
In the past few years, we've seen quite a few reports suggesting that homework doesn't help kids learn along with some other reports questioning traditional learning techniques. However, it's still a bit surprising for it reach the level where a teachers' union in the UK is already considering a proposal to ditch homework for most younger students and drastically scale back how much there is for older students (found via Digg). The reasoning is a bit different. The older reports we saw pointed out that homework wasn't particularly effective at helping kids learn. The reasoning for this new proposal is that homework makes kids "unhappy and anxious" and that leads to stressed out kids and potential disciplinary problems. It would be interesting to see any actual research supporting one side or the other here. I think it's great that teachers aren't just assuming that homework must be good, since that's how it's always been done, but that doesn't necessarily mean it should be done away with completely.
We need to stop babying these kids and worrying about thier mood and anxiety. Give them work, make them do it, and if they are sad about it, they will get over it. They need to be prepared for the real world.
If it doesn't help them learn why make them do it? So they learn that life is about doing useless things because someone wants you to?
We have a problem in modern society of kids not exercising their brains in creative ways like playing. Instead their activities are structured and arranged by their parents. If schools can give them more time to be independent, great.
Some classes need homework, but not all
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Go fuck yourself dipshit. I used average in the layman's sense. How many people talk about medians on a daily basis, you fucking pedantic prick.
I'm guessing that you had to do some research! :laugh:
Originally posted by: piasabird
I think some homework is OK. However, I dont think it should be turned in or graded. Some kids are about brainless when it comes to turning in homework. Just give a quiz once a week to check how they are doing.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Am I the only person here who hasn't the foggiest notion what the HELL Moonbeam is talking about?
I doubt like shit you are. You were probably educated in school and no know nothing like most people. Just go to Goolle and type in 'Follow your bliss' and read the first link that comes up.
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
This seems to be a minority opinion around here, that?s nothing new for me, but I have to agree with their notion and the reason behind what they are doing.
Making the students resent and hate education is not a surefire way to make sure they become educated. Practice makes perfect, but that should already be covered among the 6 hours they spend in school every day, and checked with testing. If the kid passes the testing, who the f? cares how many hours a day were taken away from them in order to achieve that result?
I?m thinking the homework is needed for students who struggle with education. In other words, those with lower IQ or disabilities. In which case why do you want to ruin it for everyone due to the folly of a minority?
Exactly 50% of people have a lower than average IQ.
:laugh:
I've also read that they used to move it up every year, with the peak of civilized intelligence being in the late 80's to early 90's. It's been going down every year since.Originally posted by: drinkmorejava
Gah I hate it when people say that. Only 50% have less than the average so long as the Median is also the average (A normal distribution). Luckily for you the, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale regularly adjust the tests so the median is 100.