• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

UK Survey Shows 95% Of 18-24 Year Olds Illegally Copy Music

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Unless rights holders plan on prosecuting 95% of a target demographic, I think this study only confirms that a paradigm shift is needed in the way artists produce and distribute music.

Personally, I think you'll start seeing more artists flock to lower-cost production models, low/no cost distribution (e.g. Trent Reznor) and make a bulk of their profits by doing live shows.

Text

More than half of young people copy the songs on their hard drives to friends and even more swap CD copies, according to research that reveals the huge challenge home copying poses to a music industry already battling internet file-sharing.

Three decades after cassette decks first allowed people to make free music tapes for friends, a study by the industry group British Music Rights suggests home copying remains just as ingrained in UK culture.

BMR's chief executive, the singer Feargal Sharkey, said the research underlines the urgent need to adapt to consumers' attitudes or face serious repercussions for the next generation of musicians.

The industry's anti-piracy efforts have largely focused on illegal online music swapping - with estimates suggesting only one in 20 digital downloads is paid for. But the online problem is potentially dwarfed by "offline copying", argues BMR. Its research, carried out by the University of Hertfordshire, suggests that, for 18-24-year-olds, home copying remains more popular than file sharing. Two-thirds of people it surveyed copy five CDs a month from friends.

Overall, 95% of the 1,158 people surveyed had engaged in some form of copying, including taking the music contents of a friend's hard drive - 58% - and the more old-fashioned method of recording from the radio.

BMR, which lobbies on behalf of composers, songwriters and music publishers, claims its research is the first academic study of its kind, and fills a hole in the industry's understanding of how people consume music.

Former Undertones frontman Sharkey said the aim was not to lambast young music consumers but to create business models that fit their behaviour and tap into the unrelenting demand for music. He hopes the findings will provide impetus for change.

"For somebody who has spent 30 years in the music industry, you instinctively know this stuff is going on. But when you actually sit looking at your computer and see a number that says 95% of people are copying music at home, you suddenly go, 'Bloody hell'," he said.

Many record label executives see the piracy problem getting worse before it gets better. The BMR research echoes other studies signalling that knowing something is illegal is no longer a deterrent. Well over half its respondents who know that copying music from a CD to a recordable disc is illegal do so anyway.

But Sharkey believes a combination of education projects and new ways of providing music to consumers - for example, advertising-funded downloads - will change that.

"Ultimately it has to get better ... At some point musicians and songwriters have to make enough money out of it otherwise they stop doing it," he said.

"My concern is for the next generation of sexually frustrated, hormone-ridden 17-year-olds that are sitting in a bedroom about to possibly, and I hope, write something like Teenage Kicks," he said, referring to the Undertones song the late DJ John Peel made his anthem.

The aspect of home copying that most worries BMR is the speed with which friends can now swap music, whether from one hard drive to another or on to MP3 players. Almost half the music in the average MP3 player collection comprises tracks that have not been paid for, the report says. People aged 18-24 keep around £750-worth of unpaid-for music on their MP3 players.

The study was carried out against the backdrop of government deliberations over how to introduce an exception in law so that people can legally copy music they have bought for private use.

Currently, UK consumers are technically breaking the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 by copying tracks from CDs to their PC or digital player, or making an extra copy to play in the car.

The Intellectual Property Office concludes consultations on changing the law tomorrow and BMR is submitting some of its research.

The music industry says it accepts consumers should not be punished for shifting music from one format to another, but some are concerned an exception will increase the perception music can be freely copied with impunity.

BMR has "no problem in principle" with the concept of changing the law. But Sharkey is urging the government to look to European law, which dictates that where a private copying-style exception is created there is also some sort of compensation for the creators and performers.

Whatever the outcome, the prevalence of offline and online music copying shows the music industry has "a lot of big challenges it needs to face up to very quickly", said Sharkey.
 
According to the law of my country, yes, I do illegally copy music.
That law, however, is idiotic. And when the music I want on my mp3 player isn't available as an mp3 unless I illegally copy it from CD to my hard drive, there isn't much in the way of other options, except carrying a CD player around with me. Which is not going to happen.
 
I think if you read the questions posed by this survey, they didn't ask if they made copies of music they owned, but rather if they made copies of music their friends owned. Or copies of music they or their friends downloaded from file sharers, illegally.

So you guys making 'backup' copies of music you own, or ripping a CD you own to MP3, can relax for now 😉
 
For $150 a year I can have a virtually unlimited number of albums at my fingertips and installed on 3 different MP3 players and available on 3 different desktops.

I can then take those MP3 players and use them in the car, at the gym, hooked up to my home theatre, ect.

I don't see much point in stealing music any more.
 
Originally posted by: skace
vi what are you referring to at $150 a year?

Rhrapsody network. It's a partnership between Real (booo urns!) and Best Buy. But with the Sansa MP3 players my wife and I have it's a really seamless, drag and drop interface.

Plus it has hundreds of user created playlists already made up. Just drag and drop.

Very nice!
 
With the age demographic of this forum being 1 or 2+ groups higher than the UK poll, it seems we have a 60/40 split regarding music piracy.

I wonder if that 95% figure would hold true in the US for 18-24 year olds?
 
Originally posted by: vi edit
For $150 a year I can have a virtually unlimited number of albums at my fingertips and installed on 3 different MP3 players and available on 3 different desktops.

I can then take those MP3 players and use them in the car, at the gym, hooked up to my home theatre, ect.

I don't see much point in stealing music any more.

Not only that, but you get consistent quality instead of a mix of crappy-encoded MP3s, radio recordings, live stuff, etc.
 
I don't pirate music, not because I give two shits about the corrupt music industry, but because there's nothing new that I want to hear. I have a library of 500+ CDs of music I like. That's all I need.
 
Originally posted by: Kaido
Originally posted by: vi edit
For $150 a year I can have a virtually unlimited number of albums at my fingertips and installed on 3 different MP3 players and available on 3 different desktops.

I can then take those MP3 players and use them in the car, at the gym, hooked up to my home theatre, ect.

I don't see much point in stealing music any more.

Not only that, but you get consistent quality instead of a mix of crappy-encoded MP3s, radio recordings, live stuff, etc.

learn how to pirate noob 😛
 
There's a pretty wide range of things covered by "illegally copy music." Copying CDs for friends is hardly anything new or interesting. I suspect if you just asked people if they do that, at least 80% would say they do.
 
95% have at least copied music (even if by this means their own) then yes. It does not mean 95% of 18-24 y.o. always copy though, right? 😉
 
I copy illegaly most of my music. I still buy cds on occasion. My favorite artists I do support in some way via attending shows or buying merchandise.
 
Here are the juicy parts, for the people who like Cliffs:

More than half of young people copy the songs on their hard drives to friends and even more swap CD copies

Two-thirds of people it surveyed copy five CDs a month from friends.

Overall, 95% of the 1,158 people surveyed had engaged in some form of copying, including taking the music contents of a friend's hard drive - 58% - and the more old-fashioned method of recording from the radio.

Well over half its respondents who know that copying music from a CD to a recordable disc is illegal do so anyway.

Almost half the music in the average MP3 player collection comprises tracks that have not been paid for, the report says. People aged 18-24 keep around £750-worth of unpaid-for music on their MP3 players.
 
By the RIAA's definition of "illegal" I illegally copy music all the time. Anytime I bypass their copy protection crap to transfer music from one medium to another for my personal use I am technically guilty of "illegally copying music".
 
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: skace
vi what are you referring to at $150 a year?

Rhrapsody network. It's a partnership between Real (booo urns!) and Best Buy. But with the Sansa MP3 players my wife and I have it's a really seamless, drag and drop interface.

Plus it has hundreds of user created playlists already made up. Just drag and drop.

Very nice!

Napster?

EDIT: Time to learn to read.
 
Back
Top