UK at'ers..what is your view on Scottish independence?

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
31,361
9,229
136
More like this. With the less prosperous countries failing and England and even France considering pulling out I am thinking about if the EU can even survive another 20 years or so. One worry is however if the EU dissolves then the only thing uniting Europe against the Muscovites is NATO and until the conflict starting this year NATO was considered as basically deteriorating as any effective organization.

I dont think that the EU necessarily unites Europe on defence issues anyway.

If you're talking military force then NATO has way more weight than the EU.
 

dr150

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2003
6,570
24
81
Nessie, the Loch Ness Monster will be the one vote to break the tie.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/loch-aye-no-loch-ness-4250034

MAIN-Loch-Ness-monster-says-no-to-the-Scottish-referendum.jpg
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
we had that problem, then this thing called the civil war and have been screwed by the central government ever since.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
31,361
9,229
136
But what do you predict over the long term for the EU?

What will actually happen or what should happen?

What should happen is massive reform and slimming down of the apparatus of European government. A clear distinction between what is local, national and pan European powers.

What will happen? No idea. :p
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
68,332
12,559
126
www.anyf.ca
is this over then? Last I saw on the news it looked like No was winning, but then Yes started to catch up a bit but was still 10% behind.
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
It'll be over in the morning. Just relax, you'll get the same news whether you're the first to hear it or the billionth.
 

Maximilian

Lifer
Feb 8, 2004
12,604
15
81
No wins, 55% to 45%

Still a deep divide but UK is staying together. :thumbsup:

Yes probably wanted a massive landslide in Glasgow that just didn't happen.
 

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
13,726
2,253
126
NO
the results are in and we've just passed the winning mark with 1.9M votes for No.

gg
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
68,332
12,559
126
www.anyf.ca
It's great to see how peaceful this whole thing was. Unless I missed it, I don't think there was any violence or anything during this whole process.
 

mmntech

Lifer
Sep 20, 2007
17,501
12
0
Good to hear the no side won. My family over there had supported remaining in the UK.

I'm not sure why the UK doesn't adopt the same system used in the United States, Canada, and Australia. With Scotland, Whales, Northern Ireland, and England as semi-autonomous provinces with their own legislatures, in full control of their own local matters. I think it's going that way with the Scottish Parliament and all, but there doesn't seem to be a clear, agreed upon, and constitutionally entrenched division of powers.

I remain skeptical about the true nature of these independence movement. Perhaps because it's been tinted with our own experiences with Quebec. Seems to me like it all boils down to money. Which is why the Quebecois get uppity every few years. They know full well they can't survive without the flow of cash from the feds. The pro-independence PQ have also proven themselves incapable and uninterested in dealing with the day to day affairs. They've very much a bellwether party.
 

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
Good to hear the no side won. My family over there had supported remaining in the UK. I'm not sure why the UK doesn't adopt the same system used in the United States, Canada, and Australia. With Scotland, Whales, Northern Ireland, and England as semi-autonomous provinces with their own legislatures, in full control of their own local matters. I think it's going that way with the Scottish Parliament and all, but there doesn't seem to be a clear, agreed upon, and constitutionally entrenched division of powers. I remain skeptical about the true nature of these independence movement. Perhaps because it's been tinted with our own experiences with Quebec. Seems to me like it all boils down to money. Which is why the Quebecois get uppity every few years. They know full well they can't survive without the flow of cash from the feds. The pro-independence PQ have also proven themselves incapable and uninterested in dealing with the day to day affairs. They've very much a bellwether party.

And yet if it were only about money this referendum would never have occurred.
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
And yet if it were only about money this referendum would never have occurred.
Of course not, not without the requisite dick stroking and flag waving. I'd go so far as to say that without the involvement of fanboy nationalists, the vote may have happened, but would have been a low-turnout referendum that most people would blink and miss.

It's not like the Scots are oppressed, targeted for disenfranchisement, facing economic ruin, or have been enemies with the English for hundreds of years. William Wallace died 710 years ago for gods' sakes. There's no compelling reason for them to secede other than because of nationalism. If it were just about fixing their problems the vote would instead have been centered on issues of a regional parliament and autonomy, and independence never would have come up. It does look like they're getting their regional autonomy anyway, and that should be good because it will address some legitimate problems, but that's not what the vote was about.