- Oct 9, 1999
- 15,216
- 3
- 81
blix says iraq isnt keeping in line with the UN resolution 1341.
edit: more to come as I hear it behind me.. on the tv.
edit: more to come as I hear it behind me.. on the tv.
Destroying evedence? Isn't that kind of like destroying the Weapons?Originally posted by: The_good_guy
nevermind powell is speaking.. i thought blix was speaking..
next time let me turn around...
oh well .. still no matter.. according to him they destroyed evidence or took care of things before letting ppl back in...
Originally posted by: Tabb
Speaking for Bush's popularity. I personally think it would be a bad idea, for Bush. Right now, accorrding to a very accurrate poll 52% of Americans think we should goto war and the rest of the 48% say we shouldn't. This would be a bad thing for Bush' popularity. I wish we could avoid war, but if it happens I support my goverment. We should have removed Saddam years ago. However, Iraq's people have suffered enough, they need to have a new leader. They have been in a endless poverty for a long time.
It'll be funny when all the anti-war protester's find out about all of Iraq's WMD's. I know they are there, we all know it.
Who, Bush?Originally posted by: AmdInside
Why can't we simply remove him from power like we did with Noriega?
Originally posted by: BoYRaCeR
So whatever happened to that Bin Laden guy...
Originally posted by: VBboy
I speak for Saddam when I say, we ain' got no biocheminukes! Now, buzz off![]()
Originally posted by: Evadman
Originally posted by: BoYRaCeR
So whatever happened to that Bin Laden guy...
Quiet! they are trying to make us forget!
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Tabb
Speaking for Bush's popularity. I personally think it would be a bad idea, for Bush. Right now, accorrding to a very accurrate poll 52% of Americans think we should goto war and the rest of the 48% say we shouldn't. This would be a bad thing for Bush' popularity. I wish we could avoid war, but if it happens I support my goverment. We should have removed Saddam years ago. However, Iraq's people have suffered enough, they need to have a new leader. They have been in a endless poverty for a long time.
It'll be funny when all the anti-war protester's find out about all of Iraq's WMD's. I know they are there, we all know it.
thats incorrect, his approvment rate dropped to 52% this week. News week poll says 65% against 35 % for war in iraq
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
George hasn't made up his mind.
Originally posted by: apoppin
Who, Bush?Originally posted by: AmdInside
Why can't we simply remove him from power like we did with Noriega?
Uh, sorry.![]()
Originally posted by: chowderhead
Why don't we finish the job and get Bin Laden and his top officals of Al Qaeda and the Taliban FIRST? I don't think we have captured or confirmed killed many of their top officals.
We should focus on the War on Terrorism and the people that actually attacked the U.S, specifically, Bin Laden and his group. I would support going after states that sponsor terrorism like Saudi Arabia and Syria but only after destroying Al Qaeda.
Why Iraq and why now?
Shouldn't we concentrate on Bin Laden and making sure that his group doesn't attack us again.
What happened to the war on terrorism?![]()