U.S. Senate candidate pledges direct democracy; electronic vote on all bills

Discussion in 'Politics and News' started by yllus, Jan 7, 2013.

  1. Zorkorist

    Zorkorist Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    6,867
    Likes Received:
    1
    It doesn't really matter any more.

    If Government is unlimited, then there is no vote. No reason to vote.

    The few folks that aren't on the Government Gravy Train by now, should be.

    Because this train is going to spend it's way into sparklemania.

    -John
     
  2. chucky2

    chucky2 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1999
    Messages:
    9,020
    Likes Received:
    4
    Given the current (and at least 3 decades) group of Politicians, you say that like it's a bad thing...
     
  3. Arkaign

    Arkaign Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    19,305
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's pick your poison really.

    What could ever go wrong when the minority has the ability to create laws at the expense of the majority via a corrupted representative government? /serious

    Lose/lose really. The best we could hope for is some kind of balanced approach, but that's pretty much impossible to determine.
     
  4. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,087
    Likes Received:
    15
    Voting on everything is a terrible thing.

    However, look at the swiss. They vote more or less on all major things.

    Problem with voting on all this tho, is that average joe often is unwilling to take the needed steps.
     
  5. boomerang

    boomerang Lifer

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2000
    Messages:
    16,799
    Likes Received:
    2
    It will never be allowed. We ceased to become a representative democracy a long, long time ago. We hire (vote for) people to go to DC to vote the way whomever is stuffing the most money into their pockets wishes them to vote. The system will not change until it collapses upon itself or is forcibly overthrown.

    Mr. Hollingsworth will not be allowed to win the election.

    Disuss the concept if you wish, but file his potential for attaining the office under ain't gonna happen.
     
    #30 boomerang, Jan 8, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2013
  6. Arkaign

    Arkaign Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    19,305
    Likes Received:
    0
    ^^ Correct.
     
  7. DrPizza

    DrPizza Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2001
    Messages:
    49,542
    Likes Received:
    103
    A large portion of our society isn't just ignorant, they celebrate their ignorance. We elect officials, who are (hopefully) better educated than the average citizen. We hope they make the best decisions for us. Though, many are cynical & believe that a lot of back room stuff is for them to make the best decisions for the elected politicians. And, though this doesn't happen always, it certainly does happen (see gerrymandering for one obvious example.)

    With direct democracy, it would be a clusterfuck. Let's just talk about tax rates - there's been plenty of discussion about tax rates for the rich lately. I think it's safe to say that the majority of Americans don't even understand marginal tax brackets - the number of people who think that if you earn x number of dollars, then you pay one percentage of your income, and magically, if you earn x+1 number of dollars, then you pay at a different rate. Even educated people posting on this forum have inadvertently pointed out that that's what they had thought. It's an incredibly common belief - I hear people discussing it all the time at various companies: "It's not worth it to work overtime, because they take so much more out in taxes." And, you want THESE people having a significant say in tax policy??
     
  8. DrPizza

    DrPizza Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2001
    Messages:
    49,542
    Likes Received:
    103
    Wait a second - Hollingsworth's idea could work to some extent, particularly since it's electronic. First, both sides on an issue write a summary of their point of view & why the vote should go in a certain direction. Then, the person who wants to vote is required to read both sides, and then take a 20 question test (10 questions from each side, approved by the other side) on every issue prior to voting. A grade of 80% or more required for passing the test. No, make that 80% on each 10 questions - we would want to avoid partisan hacks who don't listen to the other side.
     
  9. rudder

    rudder Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2000
    Messages:
    19,106
    Likes Received:
    6
    How long would the citizens get to read a bill before voting on it? 6 minutes? Would any of the people actually read the bills presented?

    As much disdain I have for the members of congress I think this is a horrible idea. I would not be long before lobbyists would be depositing money in paypal when people voted a certain way.
     
  10. JTsyo

    JTsyo Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    10,045
    Likes Received:
    6
    If there was a direct vote, it should be in the House not Senate. At least then there would be some balance. I have low confidence in my fellow citizens to actually know how laws would effect life. Heck, I don't have a full understanding of politics and law and wouldn't trust myself to vote on everything.
     
  11. Arkaign

    Arkaign Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    19,305
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hahaha, isn't that much the current situation, only with this we'd have payoffs going to people rather than only politicians.

    Our political structure is beyond broken, I said it with W, and I'll say it again now. It just doesn't function.
     
  12. airdata

    airdata Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,987
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's not as if you will possibly get everybody to vote this way.

    They just need to limit senate terms and limit the length of bills to a few pages to ensure that they're actually read. Our current form of voting on bills that are all TLDR is just fucking absurd.
     
  13. momeNt

    momeNt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    6,816
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm more in favor of slowly phasing out electing candidates at all and just instating a nobility. Let the workers work and the leaders lead, democracy and elections is an unneeded intermingling of the two.